Rosemary Lim

42 papers receiving 818 citations

Peers

Rosemary Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 123
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 172
  • Emergency Medical Services 86
  • Family Practice 18
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 34
Replace Nerée Claes with:
Nerée Claes Belgium
Nada Atef Shebl United Kingdom
Ellen Schafheutle United Kingdom
Monsey McLeod United Kingdom
Ramadan Elkalmi Malaysia
Darshana Bennadi India
Helene Levens Lipton United States
Margô Gomes de Oliveira Karnikowski Brazil
Kingston Rajiah Malaysia
Abdulrouf Pallivalapila Qatar
Rosemary Lim relative to Nerée Claes Belgium Nerée Claes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nerée Claes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Lim. The network helps show where Rosemary Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rosemary Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rosemary Lim Line = papers co-authored together Rosemary Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009219
2 2020131
3 201963
4 201859
5 201738
6 201536
7 201535
8 201732
9 201916
10 202015
11 201215
12 201514
13 201814
14 201812
15 202311
16 201911
17 202011
18 202210
19 202010
20 20219

About Rosemary Lim

Rosemary Lim is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Pollution and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (9 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (5 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (123 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (172 citations), Emergency Medical Services (86 citations), Family Practice (18 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (34 citations). Rosemary Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Molly Courtenay, Clare Crowley, Kath Ryan, Taniya Sharmeen, Peter Buckle, Rachel L. Howard, Elizabeth M. Williamson, Angel Chater, David K. Raynor and Claire Standage. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, BMC Health Services Research and Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact