Rosemary Lim

1.6k total citations
48 papers, 811 citations indexed

About

Rosemary Lim is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosemary Lim has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 811 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in General Health Professions, 12 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 11 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Recurrent topics in Rosemary Lim's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (12 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (11 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (9 papers). Rosemary Lim is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (12 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (11 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (9 papers). Rosemary Lim collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Rosemary Lim's co-authors include Molly Courtenay, Clare Crowley, Kath Ryan, Taniya Sharmeen, Peter Buckle, Rachel L. Howard, Elizabeth M. Williamson, Angel Chater, Nicholas Barber and David P Alldred and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

In The Last Decade

Rosemary Lim

42 papers receiving 788 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rosemary Lim United Kingdom 13 283 276 180 147 113 48 811
Nerée Claes Belgium 16 180 0.6× 122 0.4× 181 1.0× 96 0.7× 82 0.7× 43 839
Elin C. Lehnbom Australia 15 217 0.8× 419 1.5× 330 1.8× 79 0.5× 85 0.8× 63 860
Helene Levens Lipton United States 17 225 0.8× 473 1.7× 118 0.7× 104 0.7× 391 3.5× 36 1.0k
Sílvia Regina Secoli Brazil 17 212 0.7× 232 0.8× 90 0.5× 49 0.3× 121 1.1× 94 1.1k
Ann Jacklin United Kingdom 21 288 1.0× 621 2.3× 664 3.7× 218 1.5× 89 0.8× 46 1.5k
Carlos Aibar Remón Spain 18 233 0.8× 97 0.4× 763 4.2× 77 0.5× 56 0.5× 89 1.4k
Ellen Schafheutle United Kingdom 20 718 2.5× 641 2.3× 172 1.0× 78 0.5× 242 2.1× 140 1.7k
Mansour Adam Mahmoud Saudi Arabia 19 93 0.3× 463 1.7× 220 1.2× 107 0.7× 134 1.2× 62 1.0k
Anne Gerd Granås Norway 20 206 0.7× 595 2.2× 157 0.9× 77 0.5× 286 2.5× 61 1.2k
Mohamed N. Al-Arifi Saudi Arabia 15 115 0.4× 291 1.1× 69 0.4× 76 0.5× 57 0.5× 42 599

Countries citing papers authored by Rosemary Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosemary Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosemary Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosemary Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosemary Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosemary Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosemary Lim. The network helps show where Rosemary Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosemary Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosemary Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosemary Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosemary Lim. Rosemary Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Khoo, Joan, et al.. (2025). Metabolic health and strategies for a Healthier SG. Singapore Medical Journal. 66(Suppl 1). S30–S37. 1 indexed citations
2.
Fraser, Simon, Sue Latter, Eloise Radcliffe, et al.. (2025). Medicine Optimisation and Deprescribing Intervention Outcomes for Older People with Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review. Drugs & Aging. 42(4). 275–294.
3.
Hollywood, Amelia, et al.. (2024). Co-designing an intervention using the COM-B model to change an eating behaviour in people living with achalasia. Frontiers in Medicine. 11. 1216209–1216209. 3 indexed citations
4.
Lim, Rosemary, et al.. (2024). Antimicrobial stewardship in sub-Saharan African community pharmacies: a systematic review of community pharmacists’ knowledge, practice and challenges faced. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 32(Supplement_2). ii61–ii62.
5.
Courtenay, Molly, David Gillespie, & Rosemary Lim. (2023). Patterns of GP and nurse independent prescriber prescriptions for antibiotics dispensed in the community in England: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 78(10). 2544–2553. 5 indexed citations
6.
7.
Lim, Rosemary, et al.. (2023). How cultural competence is conceptualised, developed and delivered in pharmacy education: a systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 46(1). 40–55. 7 indexed citations
8.
Lim, Rosemary, et al.. (2023). 451 A systematic review exploring cultural competence in pharmacy education. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 31(Supplement_1). i11–i12. 1 indexed citations
9.
Lim, Rosemary, et al.. (2022). Using video reflexive ethnography to explore the use of variable rate intravenous insulin infusions. BMC Health Services Research. 22(1). 545–545.
10.
Lim, Rosemary, et al.. (2022). Fijian Farmers' Attitude and Knowledge Towards Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Livestock Production Systems–A Qualitative Study. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 9. 838457–838457. 9 indexed citations
11.
Lim, Rosemary, et al.. (2021). Detailed analysis of ‘work as imagined’ in the use of intravenous insulin infusions in a hospital: a hierarchical task analysis. BMJ Open. 11(3). e041848–e041848. 4 indexed citations
13.
Courtenay, Molly, Samantha Rowbotham, Rosemary Lim, et al.. (2019). Examining influences on antibiotic prescribing by nurse and pharmacist prescribers: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B. BMJ Open. 9(6). e029177–e029177. 63 indexed citations
15.
Anderson, Janet, Alastair Ross, Rosemary Lim, et al.. (2019). Nursing teamwork in the care of older people: A mixed methods study. Applied Ergonomics. 80. 119–129. 15 indexed citations
16.
Courtenay, Molly, David Gillespie, & Rosemary Lim. (2017). Patterns of dispensed non-medical prescriber prescriptions for antibiotics in primary care across England: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 72(10). 2915–2920. 31 indexed citations
17.
Courtenay, Molly, Samantha Rowbotham, Rosemary Lim, et al.. (2017). Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management. BMJ Open. 7(3). e013515–e013515. 37 indexed citations
18.
Howard, Rachel L., et al.. (2015). Cancer patients taking herbal medicines: A review of clinical purposes, associated factors, and perceptions of benefit or harm. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 175. 58–66. 33 indexed citations
19.
Lim, Rosemary, et al.. (2015). Traditional medicine use by cancer patients in Thailand. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 168. 100–107. 36 indexed citations
20.
Barber, Nicholas, David P Alldred, David K. Raynor, et al.. (2009). Care homes' use of medicines study: prevalence, causes and potential harm of medication errors in care homes for older people. BMJ Quality & Safety. 18(5). 341–346. 216 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026