Rose Wharton

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
24 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Rose Wharton is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rose Wharton has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Epidemiology, 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 5 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Rose Wharton's work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (7 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (5 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers). Rose Wharton is often cited by papers focused on Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (7 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (5 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers). Rose Wharton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Canada. Rose Wharton's co-authors include George Lewith, Susan Dutton, Milensu Shanyinde, Ly‐Mee Yu, Gary S. Collins, Peter M. Rothwell, Merryn Voysey, Joris A. H. de Groot, Abdelouahid Tajar and Douglas G. Altman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neurology and Stroke.

In The Last Decade

Rose Wharton

23 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting

2014 487 citations Gary S. Collins, Joris A. H. de Groot et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rose Wharton United Kingdom	13	277	274	268	246	186	24	1.4k
Peijing Yan China	23	346 1.2×	452 1.6×	197 0.7×	291 1.2×	199 1.1×	99	1.7k
Ruzan Udumyan Sweden	24	179 0.6×	281 1.0×	342 1.3×	110 0.4×	367 2.0×	48	1.7k
Dianne O’Connell Australia	15	180 0.6×	311 1.1×	228 0.9×	100 0.4×	93 0.5×	18	1.4k
Kristijan H. Kahler United States	27	194 0.7×	480 1.8×	250 0.9×	164 0.7×	454 2.4×	72	2.9k
Constantinos Koshiaris United Kingdom	17	119 0.4×	308 1.1×	240 0.9×	114 0.5×	653 3.5×	56	1.7k
Itziar Etxeandia‐Ikobaltzeta United States	18	136 0.5×	157 0.6×	94 0.4×	98 0.4×	131 0.7×	32	1.1k
Karel Moons Netherlands	11	133 0.5×	318 1.2×	385 1.4×	302 1.2×	317 1.7×	19	2.6k
Alireza Moayyeri United Kingdom	28	184 0.7×	589 2.1×	337 1.3×	76 0.3×	202 1.1×	70	2.5k
Ashma Krishan United Kingdom	15	85 0.3×	146 0.5×	214 0.8×	324 1.3×	240 1.3×	32	1.3k
Stanley Ip United States	26	104 0.4×	360 1.3×	372 1.4×	580 2.4×	680 3.7×	46	2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Rose Wharton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Wharton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Wharton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Wharton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Wharton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Wharton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Wharton. The network helps show where Rose Wharton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rose Wharton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rose Wharton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rose Wharton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rose Wharton. Rose Wharton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Ganesh, Aravind, Ramón Luengo-Fernández, Rose Wharton, & Peter M. Rothwell. (2018). Ordinal vs dichotomous analyses of modified Rankin Scale, 5-year outcome, and cost of stroke. Neurology. 91(21). e1951–e1960. 72 indexed citations

Wharton, Rose, et al.. (2017). Routine screening in the general hospital: what happens after discharge to those identified as at risk of dementia?. Clinical Medicine. 17(5). 395–400. 2 indexed citations

Mazzucco, Sara, Linxin Li, Assunção Tuna, et al.. (2017). Time-of-Day Could Affect Cognitive Screening Performance in Older Patients with TIA and Stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 43(5-6). 290–293. 8 indexed citations

Ganesh, Aravind, Ramón Luengo-Fernández, Rose Wharton, et al.. (2017). Time-course of functional recovery after acute ischaemic stroke and its relationship to cause-specific mortality: Implications for follow-up of stroke trials (S19.004). Neurology. 88(16_supplement). 1 indexed citations

Pendlebury, Sarah T., Nicola Lovett, Sarah C. Smith, Rose Wharton, & Peter M. Rothwell. (2016). Delirium risk stratification in consecutive unselected admissions to acute medicine: validation of a susceptibility score based on factors identified externally in pooled data for use at entry to the acute care pathway. Age and Ageing. 46(2). 226–231. 35 indexed citations

Mazzucco, Sara, Linxin Li, Assunção Tuna, et al.. (2016). Hemodynamic correlates of transient cognitive impairment after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: A transcranial Doppler study. International Journal of Stroke. 11(9). 978–986. 8 indexed citations

Mazzucco, Sara, et al.. (2015). Centrally Observed home telemetric Monitoring of blood pressure TO Manage Intensive Treatment (COMMIT) after TIA and stroke: Cerebral hemodynamics substudy. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 65–65. 4 indexed citations

Wharton, Rose, et al.. (2015). Methodological factors in determining rates of dementia and cognitive impairment in TIA and stroke: Applicability of short cognitive tests. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 187–188.

Pendlebury, Sarah T., et al.. (2015). Routine cognitive screening in older patients admitted to acute medicine: abbreviated mental test score (AMTS) and subjective memory complaint versus Montreal Cognitive Assessment and IQCODE. Age and Ageing. 44(6). 1000–1005. 54 indexed citations

10.

Fadhil, Wakkas, Rose Wharton, Yoko Yanagisawa, et al.. (2015). Aberrant P53 expression lacks prognostic or predictive significance in colorectal cancer: results from the VICTOR trial.. PubMed. 35(3). 1641–5. 10 indexed citations

11.

Pendlebury, Sarah T., Ping‐Jen Chen, Sarah Welch, et al.. (2015). Methodological Factors in Determining Risk of Dementia After Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke. Stroke. 46(6). 1494–1500. 38 indexed citations

12.

Spathis, Anna, Kate Fife, Fiona Blackhall, et al.. (2014). Modafinil for the Treatment of Fatigue in Lung Cancer: Results of a Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 32(18). 1882–1888. 78 indexed citations

13.

Hopewell, Sally, Gary S. Collins, Isabelle Boutron, et al.. (2014). Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study. BMJ. 349(jul01 8). g4145–g4145. 72 indexed citations

14.

Collins, Gary S., Joris A. H. de Groot, Susan Dutton, et al.. (2014). External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 14(1). 40–40. 487 indexed citations breakdown →

15.

Fife, Kate, Anna Spathis, Susan Dutton, et al.. (2013). A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of modafinil for lung cancer-related fatigue: Dose response and patient satisfaction data.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 31(15_suppl). 9503–9503. 4 indexed citations

16.

Nicum, Shibani, Claire Brooks, Rose Wharton, et al.. (2013). Phase II clinical trial of six mercaptopurine (6MP) and methotrexate in patients with BRCA-defective tumors.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 31(15_suppl). TPS5615–TPS5615. 1 indexed citations

17.

Khan, Zubair, et al.. (2001). p53 Mutation and response to hepatic arterial floxuridine in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 127(11). 675–680. 6 indexed citations

18.

Fordy, C, C Glover, D C Henderson, et al.. (1999). Contribution of diet, tumour volume and patient-related factors to weight loss in patients with colorectal liver metastases. British journal of surgery. 86(5). 639–644. 19 indexed citations

19.

Kazemier, Geert, H. J. Bonjer, Frits J. Berends, et al.. (1995). Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. British journal of surgery. 82(8). 1141–1142. 57 indexed citations

20.

Wharton, Rose & George Lewith. (1986). Complementary medicine and the general practitioner.. BMJ. 292(6534). 1498–1500. 149 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact