Rosa Geurtzen

529 total citations
35 papers, 281 citations indexed

About

Rosa Geurtzen is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Rosa Geurtzen has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 281 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 21 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Rosa Geurtzen's work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (21 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (16 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers). Rosa Geurtzen is often cited by papers focused on Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (21 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (16 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers). Rosa Geurtzen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Rosa Geurtzen's co-authors include Marije Hogeveen, Arno van Heijst, Jos Draaisma, Rosella Hermens, Hubertina Scheepers, Mallory Woiski, E. J. T. Verweij, Irwin Reiss, Hafez Ismaili M’hamdi and Eduard Verhagen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Patient Education and Counseling.

In The Last Decade

Rosa Geurtzen

30 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Rosa Geurtzen
Stephanie L. Bourque United States
Joana Mendes Portugal
Elisabeth McGowan United States
Anna B. Hedstrom United States
Lucie Hobson United Kingdom
Silke Mader Netherlands
Katie Hunt United Kingdom
Stephanie L. Bourque United States
Rosa Geurtzen
Citations per year, relative to Rosa Geurtzen Rosa Geurtzen (= 1×) peers Stephanie L. Bourque

Countries citing papers authored by Rosa Geurtzen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rosa Geurtzen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosa Geurtzen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosa Geurtzen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rosa Geurtzen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosa Geurtzen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosa Geurtzen. The network helps show where Rosa Geurtzen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosa Geurtzen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosa Geurtzen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosa Geurtzen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosa Geurtzen. Rosa Geurtzen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Obermann-Borst, Sylvia A, et al.. (2025). Key factors in parental end-of-life decision making for surgical necrotizing enterocolitis: A Delphi study. Early Human Development. 203. 106219–106219. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vries, Marieke de, Marije Hogeveen, Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, et al.. (2025). Stakeholder Perspectives on the Design of First‐In‐Human Trials for Artificial Amnion and Placenta Technology: A Qualitative Study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 132(11). 1574–1583.
3.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W., Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, Nanon Labrie, et al.. (2025). Empowering parents in neonatal decision making using Q-methodology: Development of a decision guidance framework for necrotizing enterocolitis. Early Human Development. 210. 106372–106372.
4.
Vries, Marieke de, Marije Hogeveen, Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, et al.. (2025). Human artificial placenta technology-trials: counselling and informed consent using healthcare professionals’ and parental perspectives. Pediatric Research. 98(6). 2385–2393.
5.
Kooi, Elisabeth M. W., Sylvia A Obermann-Borst, Rosa Geurtzen, et al.. (2024). Development of a parent decision support tool for surgical necrotising enterocolitis: a study protocol. BMJ Open. 14(12). e087939–e087939. 1 indexed citations
6.
Mulder, Renée L., Jurrianne C. Fahner, Johannes Verheijden, et al.. (2024). A Dutch paediatric palliative care guideline: a systematic review and recommendations on advance care planning and shared decision-making. BMC Palliative Care. 23(1). 270–270.
7.
Obermann-Borst, Sylvia A, Marije Hogeveen, E. J. T. Verweij, et al.. (2024). Mind the gap: Comparing parents' information needs about impending preterm birth to current clinical practices using a mixed methods approach. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 100297–100297. 1 indexed citations
8.
Vries, Marieke de, et al.. (2023). A scoping review of parental values during prenatal decisions about treatment options after extremely premature birth. Acta Paediatrica. 112(5). 911–918. 12 indexed citations
9.
Verweij, E. J. T., et al.. (2023). Viability, abortion and extreme prematurity: a critique. Clinical Ethics. 18(4). 385–392. 2 indexed citations
10.
Andriessen, Peter, Floris Groenendaal, Marije Hogeveen, et al.. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges of Prognostic Models for Extremely Preterm Infants. Children. 10(10). 1712–1712. 1 indexed citations
12.
Vries, Marieke de, et al.. (2023). Perspectives of extremely prematurely born adults on what to consider in prenatal decision-making: a qualitative focus group study. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal. 109(2). 196–201. 2 indexed citations
13.
Geurtzen, Rosa, et al.. (2022). What hinders and helps in the end‐of‐life decision‐making process for children: Parents’ and physicians’ views. Acta Paediatrica. 111(4). 873–887. 8 indexed citations
14.
Cate, Floris E.A. Udink ten, Sacha Ferdinandusse, Simone Denis, et al.. (2022). Neonatal Long-Chain 3-Ketoacyl-CoA Thiolase deficiency: Clinical-biochemical phenotype, sodium-D,L-3-hydroxybutyrate treatment experience and cardiac evaluation using speckle echocardiography. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports. 31. 100873–100873. 3 indexed citations
15.
Geurtzen, Rosa, et al.. (2021). Prenatal counseling for extreme prematurity at the limit of viability: A scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling. 105(7). 1743–1760. 20 indexed citations
16.
Geurtzen, Rosa, et al.. (2021). Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret. Journal of Perinatology. 41(9). 2201–2207. 9 indexed citations
17.
Verweij, E. J. T., Hafez Ismaili M’hamdi, Irwin Reiss, et al.. (2021). The Edge of Perinatal Viability: Understanding the Dutch Position. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 9. 634290–634290. 20 indexed citations
18.
Geurtzen, Rosa, Arno van Heijst, Jos Draaisma, et al.. (2019). Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity - Insight into preferences from experienced parents. Patient Education and Counseling. 102(8). 1541–1549. 27 indexed citations
19.
Geurtzen, Rosa, Arno van Heijst, Jos Draaisma, et al.. (2017). Professionals’ preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study. European Journal of Pediatrics. 176(8). 1107–1119. 29 indexed citations
20.
Geurtzen, Rosa, Marije Hogeveen, Anand K. Rajani, et al.. (2014). Using Simulation to Study Difficult Clinical Issues. Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 9(3). 167–173. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026