Ros Bramwell

1.8k total citations
49 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Ros Bramwell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ros Bramwell has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 13 papers in Epidemiology and 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Ros Bramwell's work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (10 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers). Ros Bramwell is often cited by papers focused on Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (10 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers). Ros Bramwell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cyprus and Australia. Ros Bramwell's co-authors include Nick Hulbert-Williams, Helen Poole, Peter Murphy, Helen West, Fiona Dykes, Michael Weindling, Peter Salmon, Christina Jones, Richard Griffiths and Gerry Humphris and has published in prestigious journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Psycho-Oncology and Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Ros Bramwell

48 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ros Bramwell United Kingdom 22 454 303 280 258 191 49 1.3k
Phoebe D. Williams United States 24 285 0.6× 539 1.8× 743 2.7× 293 1.1× 210 1.1× 55 1.8k
Rachel F. Schiffman United States 23 447 1.0× 618 2.0× 343 1.2× 116 0.4× 328 1.7× 69 1.6k
Elisabeth Hamrin Sweden 24 454 1.0× 149 0.5× 376 1.3× 257 1.0× 555 2.9× 50 1.8k
Christina Faull United Kingdom 18 423 0.9× 315 1.0× 245 0.9× 158 0.6× 336 1.8× 82 1.2k
Tomer T. Levin United States 21 725 1.6× 255 0.8× 321 1.1× 295 1.1× 575 3.0× 66 1.7k
Chris Parker United Kingdom 18 396 0.9× 198 0.7× 127 0.5× 314 1.2× 389 2.0× 33 1.3k
Agneta Anderzén‐Carlsson Sweden 22 244 0.5× 317 1.0× 416 1.5× 102 0.4× 254 1.3× 92 1.2k
Lisa C. Campbell United States 18 492 1.1× 272 0.9× 509 1.8× 309 1.2× 430 2.3× 42 2.3k
Ned H. Cassem United States 25 318 0.7× 476 1.6× 177 0.6× 475 1.8× 395 2.1× 57 2.2k
Josef Jenewein Switzerland 27 318 0.7× 820 2.7× 447 1.6× 275 1.1× 263 1.4× 103 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Ros Bramwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ros Bramwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ros Bramwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ros Bramwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ros Bramwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ros Bramwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ros Bramwell. The network helps show where Ros Bramwell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ros Bramwell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ros Bramwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ros Bramwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ros Bramwell. Ros Bramwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bramwell, Ros, et al.. (2017). Unmet psychosocial supportive care needs and psychological distress in haematological cancer survivors: The moderating role of psychological flexibility. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 6(2). 187–194. 29 indexed citations
2.
Hulbert-Williams, Nick, et al.. (2016). ‘Haematological cancers, they’re a funny bunch’: A qualitative study of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patient experiences of unmet supportive care needs. Journal of Health Psychology. 23(11). 1464–1475. 27 indexed citations
3.
Hulbert-Williams, Nick, et al.. (2014). Unmet psychosocial needs in haematological cancer: a systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer. 22(4). 1131–1141. 83 indexed citations
4.
Brown, Stephen L., et al.. (2009). Psychological adjustment to gynaecological cancer: Patients’ illness representations, coping strategies and mood disturbance. Psychology and Health. 25(5). 633–646. 43 indexed citations
5.
Poole, Helen, et al.. (2009). Depression in Chronic Pain Patients: Prevalence and Measurement. Pain Practice. 9(3). 173–180. 93 indexed citations
6.
Poole, Helen, Ros Bramwell, & Peter Murphy. (2008). The utility of the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen (BDI‐FS) in a pain clinic population. European Journal of Pain. 13(8). 865–869. 61 indexed citations
7.
Bramwell, Ros, et al.. (2008). Expectations and Experience of Labial Reduction: A Qualitative Study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 63(3). 145–146. 9 indexed citations
8.
Bramwell, Ros, et al.. (2007). Expectations and experience of labial reduction: a qualitative study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 114(12). 1493–1499. 86 indexed citations
9.
Humphris, Gerry, et al.. (2007). Use of a screening questionnaire for post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on a sample of UK ICU patients. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 52(2). 202–208. 111 indexed citations
10.
Bramwell, Ros, et al.. (2006). Attitudes towards and experience of the menstrual cycle across different cultural and religious groups. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 24(4). 314–322. 12 indexed citations
11.
West, Helen & Ros Bramwell. (2006). Do maternal screening tests provide psychologically meaningful results? Cognitive psychology in an applied setting. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 24(1). 61–69. 6 indexed citations
12.
Poole, Helen, Ros Bramwell, & Peter Murphy. (2006). Factor Structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Patients With Chronic Pain. Clinical Journal of Pain. 22(9). 790–798. 73 indexed citations
13.
Bramwell, Ros, Helen West, & Peter Salmon. (2006). Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study. BMJ. 333(7562). 284–284. 81 indexed citations
14.
Bramwell, Ros & Michael Weindling. (2005). Families’ views on ward rounds in neonatal units: Table 1. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal. 90(5). F429–F431. 37 indexed citations
15.
Bramwell, Ros. (2001). Blood and Milk: Constructions of Female Bodily Fluids in Western Society. Women & Health. 34(4). 85–96. 34 indexed citations
16.
Bramwell, Ros & Deborah Carter. (2001). An exploration of midwives' and obstetricians' knowledge of genetic screening in pregnancy and their perception of appropriate counselling. Midwifery. 17(2). 133–141. 18 indexed citations
17.
Woods, Anne B., Ros Bramwell, & Fiona Dykes. (2001). Teaching breast-feeding skills: Is it time for a new approach?. British Journal of Midwifery. 9(5). 301–306. 3 indexed citations
18.
Morán, Victoria Hall, et al.. (2001). Should midwives be teaching aquanatal exercise?. British Journal of Midwifery. 9(5). 275–280. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bramwell, Ros & Marilyn J. Davidson. (1993). Visual display units and pregnancy outcome: a prospective study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 14(3). 197–210. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026