Ron van Hoof

618 total citations
10 papers, 270 citations indexed

About

Ron van Hoof is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Ron van Hoof has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 270 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Ron van Hoof's work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (6 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers). Ron van Hoof is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (6 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers). Ron van Hoof collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Ron van Hoof's co-authors include Maarten Sierhuis, William J. Clancey, Patricia Sachs, Renia Jeffers, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Alessandro Acquisti, Matt Johnson, Andrzej Uszok, James Lott and Maggie Breedy and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Figshare and University of Twente Research Information.

In The Last Decade

Ron van Hoof

10 papers receiving 208 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ron van Hoof United States	7	126	75	60	52	50	10	270
Timothy Hanratty United States	9	147 1.2×	35 0.5×	57 0.9×	26 0.5×	16 0.3×	38	301
Michael Wolverton United States	10	231 1.8×	65 0.9×	49 0.8×	48 0.9×	24 0.5×	20	386
Mohamed Dekhil United States	9	316 2.5×	158 2.1×	25 0.4×	55 1.1×	18 0.4×	35	491
Marcus J. Huber United States	10	352 2.8×	42 0.6×	33 0.6×	73 1.4×	29 0.6×	29	442
Larry Bunch United States	10	197 1.6×	186 2.5×	31 0.5×	137 2.6×	49 1.0×	30	424
Hyuckchul Jung United States	10	247 2.0×	71 0.9×	30 0.5×	60 1.2×	19 0.4×	23	330
Waleed W. Smari United States	10	110 0.9×	108 1.4×	13 0.2×	104 2.0×	37 0.7×	40	299
Thomas C. Eskridge United States	9	122 1.0×	86 1.1×	21 0.3×	69 1.3×	14 0.3×	36	259
Javier Carbó Spain	11	229 1.8×	112 1.5×	22 0.4×	115 2.2×	14 0.3×	46	403
James Lott United States	7	214 1.7×	203 2.7×	24 0.4×	117 2.3×	68 1.4×	13	386

Countries citing papers authored by Ron van Hoof

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ron van Hoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ron van Hoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ron van Hoof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ron van Hoof

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ron van Hoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ron van Hoof. The network helps show where Ron van Hoof may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ron van Hoof

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ron van Hoof. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ron van Hoof based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ron van Hoof. Ron van Hoof is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Sierhuis, Maarten, et al.. (2021). Human-Agent Teamwork and Adjustable Autonomy in Practice. Figshare. 6 indexed citations

2.

Bradshaw, Jeffrey M., Alessandro Acquisti, James F. Allen, et al.. (2014). Teamwork-centered autonomy for extended human-agent interaction in space applications. 6 indexed citations

3.

Sierhuis, Maarten, Alessandro Acquisti, David Bushnell, et al.. (2006). Agent-based Mission Modeling and Simulation. 1 indexed citations

4.

Sierhuis, Maarten, William J. Clancey, Daniel C. Berrios, et al.. (2005). NASA's Mobile Agents Architecture: A Multi-Agent Workflow and Communication System for Planetary Exploration. 603. 62. 9 indexed citations

5.

Bradshaw, Jeffrey M., Paul J. Feltovich, Hyuckchul Jung, et al.. (2005). Policy-based coordination in joint human-agent activity. 2. 2029–2036. 5 indexed citations

6.

Clancey, William J., et al.. (2003). Advantages of Brahms for Specifying and Implementing a Multiagent Human-Robotic Exploration System. The Florida AI Research Society. 7–11. 23 indexed citations

7.

Bradshaw, Jeffrey M., Maarten Sierhuis, Alessandro Acquisti, et al.. (2003). Living With Agents and Liking It: Addressing the Technical and Social Acceptability of Agent Technology. 2 indexed citations

8.

Bradshaw, Jeffrey M., Andrzej Uszok, Renia Jeffers, et al.. (2003). Representation and reasoning for DAML-based policy and domain services in KAoS and nomads. Figshare. 835–842. 84 indexed citations

9.

Sierhuis, Maarten, William J. Clancey, Ron van Hoof, & Robert de Hoog. (2000). Modeling and Simulating Human Activity. University of Twente Research Information. 100–110. 13 indexed citations

10.

Clancey, William J., Patricia Sachs, Maarten Sierhuis, & Ron van Hoof. (1998). Brahms: simulating practice for work systems design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 49(6). 831–865. 121 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact