Roman Stricker

987 total citations · 2 hit papers
10 papers, 447 citations indexed

About

Roman Stricker is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Roman Stricker has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 447 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Roman Stricker's work include Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers). Roman Stricker is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers). Roman Stricker collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Roman Stricker's co-authors include M. Meth, Thomas Monz, Martin Ringbauer, Lukas Postler, Philipp Schindler, R. Blatt, Ivan Pogorelov, Manuel Rispler, Thomas Feldker and Christian D. Marciniak and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and Nature Physics.

In The Last Decade

Roman Stricker

8 papers receiving 438 citations

Hit Papers

A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 2022 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Roman Stricker Austria 5 380 275 58 46 13 10 447
Lukas Postler Austria 8 594 1.6× 469 1.7× 75 1.3× 88 1.9× 20 1.5× 16 730
Zhenyu Cai United Kingdom 9 407 1.1× 270 1.0× 59 1.0× 68 1.5× 16 1.2× 17 488
Jinzhao Sun United Kingdom 10 457 1.2× 318 1.2× 68 1.2× 27 0.6× 20 1.5× 21 517
Ivan Pogorelov Austria 8 548 1.4× 452 1.6× 57 1.0× 80 1.7× 26 2.0× 11 676
Marius Nagy Canada 6 247 0.7× 210 0.8× 40 0.7× 23 0.5× 7 0.5× 31 307
E. Tolkacheva Sweden 11 308 0.8× 290 1.1× 37 0.6× 102 2.2× 11 0.8× 17 462
Richard Rines United States 4 252 0.7× 174 0.6× 46 0.8× 29 0.6× 9 0.7× 4 318
Christian D. Marciniak Austria 8 510 1.3× 453 1.6× 56 1.0× 95 2.1× 39 3.0× 16 677
Thomas Feldker Germany 11 480 1.3× 592 2.2× 47 0.8× 63 1.4× 23 1.8× 15 761

Countries citing papers authored by Roman Stricker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roman Stricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roman Stricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roman Stricker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roman Stricker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roman Stricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roman Stricker. The network helps show where Roman Stricker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roman Stricker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roman Stricker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roman Stricker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roman Stricker. Roman Stricker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Ringbauer, Martin, Thomas Feldker, Juan Bermejo-Vega, et al.. (2025). Verifiable measurement-based quantum random sampling with trapped ions. Nature Communications. 16(1). 106–106. 4 indexed citations
2.
Postler, Lukas, Ivan Pogorelov, Manuel Rispler, et al.. (2022). Demonstration of fault-tolerant universal quantum gate operations. Nature. 605(7911). 675–680. 183 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Ringbauer, Martin, M. Meth, Lukas Postler, et al.. (2022). A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions. Nature Physics. 18(9). 1053–1057. 199 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Stricker, Roman, M. Meth, Lukas Postler, et al.. (2022). Experimental Single-Setting Quantum State Tomography. PRX Quantum. 3(4). 43 indexed citations
5.
Meth, M., Rick van Bijnen, Lukas Postler, et al.. (2022). Probing Phases of Quantum Matter with an Ion-Trap Tensor-Network Quantum Eigensolver. Physical Review X. 12(4). 5 indexed citations
6.
Stricker, Roman, Davide Vodola, Alexander Erhard, et al.. (2022). Characterizing Quantum Instruments: From Nondemolition Measurements to Quantum Error Correction. PRX Quantum. 3(3). 3 indexed citations
7.
Ringbauer, Martin, Jonathan A. Jones, Lukas Postler, et al.. (2021). Cross-verification of independent quantum devices. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 8 indexed citations
8.
Ringbauer, Martin, Jonathan A. Jones, Irati Alonso Calafell, et al.. (2021). Cross-verification of independent quantum devices.
9.
Stricker, Roman, Davide Vodola, Alexander Erhard, et al.. (2021). Experimental deterministic correction of qubit loss [1]. 1–1. 1 indexed citations
10.
Erhard, Alexander, Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup, M. Meth, et al.. (2020). Entangling logical qubits with lattice surgery. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026