Roman Forker

1.5k citations
66 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Roman Forker

64 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Roman Forker
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 524
  • Materials Chemistry 649
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 782
  • Biomedical Engineering 481
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 75
Replace Achim Schöll with:
Achim Schöll Germany
C. Goletti Italy
L. Kilian Germany
Piotr Piątkowski Poland
Daniel Lüftner Austria
Jorge Lobo‐Checa Spain
J. Schiessling Sweden
I. Bezel United States
J. Todd Stuckless Canada
G. Gavrila Germany
Roman Forker relative to Achim Schöll Germany Achim Schöll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Achim Schöll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roman Forker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roman Forker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roman Forker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roman Forker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roman Forker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roman Forker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roman Forker. The network helps show where Roman Forker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roman Forker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roman Forker Line = papers co-authored together Roman Forker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200898
2 201288
3 200982
4 201358
5 201558
6 201048
7 200838
8 201733
9 201031
10 201327
11 201226
12 201325
13 201425
14 201525
15 201824
16 201724
17 200924
18 200923
19 201423
20 201223

About Roman Forker

Roman Forker is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (36 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (22 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (19 papers), Graphene research and applications (15 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (13 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (524 citations), Materials Chemistry (649 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (782 citations), Biomedical Engineering (481 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (75 citations). Roman Forker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Torsten Fritz, Marco Gruenewald, Matthias Meißner, Thomas Dienel, Christian Wagner, Stefan C. B. Mannsfeld, Christian Loppacher, Félix Otto, Daniel Kasemann and Kläus Müllen. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Physical review. B., ACS Nano, Langmuir and Organic Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026