Roger Suffling
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel ScottDavid W. SmithP. G. SmithPhilip J. HowarthPaul TreitzMike FlanniganIan D. ThompsonRob Feick
- Topics
- Fire effects on ecosystems (8 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers)Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Roger Suffling
22 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Global and Planetary Change 230
- Ecology 182
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 136
- Atmospheric Science 85
- Ecological Modeling 67
Countries citing papers authored by Roger Suffling
This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Suffling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Suffling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Suffling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Suffling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Suffling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Suffling. The network helps show where Roger Suffling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger Suffling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger Suffling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger Suffling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roger Suffling. Roger Suffling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | An index of ecological sensitivity to disturbance based on ecosystem age and related to landscape diversity | 9 |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Plant community age as a measure of sensitivity of ecosystems to disturbance | 4 |
| 20 | 32 |
About Roger Suffling
Roger Suffling is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 22 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (67 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (136 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (230 citations). Roger Suffling has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Scott, David W. Smith, P. G. Smith, Philip J. Howarth, Paul Treitz, Mike Flannigan, Ian D. Thompson, Rob Feick, Michael I. Evans and Ajith H. Perera. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, Journal of Environmental Management and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.