Roger Brice

617 total citations
9 papers, 476 citations indexed

About

Roger Brice is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Roger Brice has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 476 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Roger Brice's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (2 papers). Roger Brice is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (2 papers). Roger Brice collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Roger Brice's co-authors include Peter Aspinall, Adrian Vickers, Catharine Ward Thompson, Susana Alves, Takemi Sugiyama, Augusto Azuara‐Blanco, Alicia Montarzino, Martyn R Partridge, John Haughney and Jenifer Ehreth and has published in prestigious journals such as European Respiratory Journal, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Roger Brice

9 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Roger Brice United Kingdom 8 168 143 90 90 82 9 476
Zahra Khorrami Iran 9 49 0.3× 33 0.2× 14 0.2× 42 0.5× 50 0.6× 38 307
Xiuqin Xiong Australia 10 120 0.7× 26 0.2× 12 0.1× 32 0.4× 44 0.5× 22 311
Christopher N. Morrison United States 10 29 0.2× 42 0.3× 41 0.5× 26 0.3× 32 0.4× 37 473
Gailutė Bernotienė Lithuania 11 454 2.7× 8 0.1× 61 0.7× 13 0.1× 42 0.5× 38 651
Mitchell L. Doucette United States 11 21 0.1× 47 0.3× 66 0.7× 17 0.2× 32 0.4× 29 429
John Somner United Kingdom 13 194 1.2× 190 1.3× 1 0.0× 126 1.4× 38 0.5× 20 585
Abdulelah Adnan Abukhalaf Saudi Arabia 13 173 1.0× 4 0.0× 5 0.1× 29 0.3× 19 0.2× 19 664
SeungHoon Han United States 4 77 0.5× 12 0.1× 12 0.1× 6 0.1× 32 0.4× 9 270
Cinira Leal France 9 174 1.0× 3 0.0× 392 4.4× 5 0.1× 48 0.6× 13 821
Juan Pablo Escalera-Antezana Colombia 9 79 0.5× 4 0.0× 9 0.1× 17 0.2× 17 0.2× 15 363

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Brice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Brice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Brice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Brice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Brice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Brice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Brice. The network helps show where Roger Brice may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roger Brice

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roger Brice. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roger Brice based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Roger Brice. Roger Brice is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Aspinall, Peter, Catharine Ward Thompson, Susana Alves, et al.. (2010). Preference and Relative Importance for Environmental Attributes of Neighbourhood Open Space in Older People. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design. 37(6). 1022–1039. 117 indexed citations
2.
Alves, Susana, Peter Aspinall, Catharine Ward Thompson, et al.. (2008). Preferences of older people for environmental attributes of local parks. Facilities. 26(11/12). 433–453. 83 indexed citations
3.
Aspinall, Peter, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of Quality of Life and Priorities of Patients with Glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(5). 1907–1907. 145 indexed citations
4.
Haughney, John, Monica Fletcher, Stephanie Wolfe, et al.. (2007). Features of asthma management: quantifying the patient perspective. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 7(1). 16–16. 15 indexed citations
5.
Bishai, David, et al.. (2007). Conjoint Analysis of French and German Parents??? Willingness to Pay for Meningococcal Vaccine. PharmacoEconomics. 25(2). 143–154. 35 indexed citations
6.
Aspinall, Peter, Adrian R. Hill, Baljean Dhillon, et al.. (2007). Quality of life and relative importance: a comparison of time trade-off and conjoint analysis methods in patients with age-related macular degeneration. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 91(6). 766–772. 15 indexed citations
7.
Haughney, John, Martyn R Partridge, Claus Vogelmeier, et al.. (2005). Exacerbations of COPD: quantifying the patient's perspective using discrete choice modelling. European Respiratory Journal. 26(4). 623–629. 48 indexed citations
8.
Aspinall, Peter, Adrian R. Hill, Colm O’Brien, et al.. (2005). Quality of Life in Patients with Glaucoma: A Conjoint Analysis Approach. 7(1). 13–26. 17 indexed citations
9.
Hill, Adrian R., Peter Aspinall, Baljean Dhillon, et al.. (2004). Utilities for quality of life from time trade–off and conjoint analysis in age related macular degeneration. 45(13). 3080–3080. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026