Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Ambient Temperature and Morbidity: A Review of Epidemiological Evidence
2011523 citationsXiaofang Ye, Rodney Wolff et al.Environmental Health Perspectivesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Rodney Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rodney Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rodney Wolff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rodney Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rodney Wolff. The network helps show where Rodney Wolff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rodney Wolff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rodney Wolff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rodney Wolff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rodney Wolff. Rodney Wolff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thompson, Helen, et al.. (2013). Copula-based spatial modelling of geometallurgical variables. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 239–246.5 indexed citations
Wolff, Rodney, et al.. (2011). Forecasting crude oil price (revisited). Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1–21.3 indexed citations
4.
Ye, Xiaofang, Rodney Wolff, Weiwei Yu, et al.. (2011). Ambient Temperature and Morbidity: A Review of Epidemiological Evidence. Environmental Health Perspectives. 120(1). 19–28.523 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Zhou, Yifan, Lin Ma, Joseph Mathew, Yong Sun, & Rodney Wolff. (2009). Prognozowanie trwałości środków technicznych z wykorzystaniem wielu wskaźników degradacji i zdarzeń awaryjnych w ujęciu modelu ciągłej przestrzeni stanów. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability. 72–81.3 indexed citations
Geva, Shlomo, et al.. (2007). News aware volatility forecasting: is the content of news important?. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 70. 161–170.4 indexed citations
8.
Trueck, Stefan, Rafał Weron, & Rodney Wolff. (2007). Outlier Treatment and Robust Approaches for Modeling Electricity Spot Prices. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).45 indexed citations
Geva, Shlomo, et al.. (2006). What Types of Events Provide the Strongest Evidence that the Stock Market is Affected by Company Specific News. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 145–153.1 indexed citations
11.
Wolff, Rodney, et al.. (2006). Recent developments of statistical approaches in cost accounting: a review. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Chan, Kung‐Sik, D. R. Cox, Colleen D. Cutler, et al.. (1995). A personal overview of non-linear time series analysis from a chaos perspective. Commentary. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 22(4). 399–445.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.