Robert W. Smith

888 total citations
65 papers, 568 citations indexed

About

Robert W. Smith is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert W. Smith has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 568 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 18 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Robert W. Smith's work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers), Sports Performance and Training (15 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (12 papers). Robert W. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers), Sports Performance and Training (15 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (12 papers). Robert W. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Robert W. Smith's co-authors include A. Guterman, Gaye Lightbody, Michael A. Kelsh, Jack D. Sahl, Grant M. Tinsley, Patrick S. Harty, Matthew T. Stratton, J. John Mann, Mark D. Underwood and Richard J. Schmidt and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Robert W. Smith

58 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert W. Smith United States 12 107 71 68 68 67 65 568
Christopher M. Kenyon Canada 8 194 1.8× 21 0.3× 190 2.8× 14 0.2× 28 0.4× 16 950
Renée Lampe Germany 16 66 0.6× 22 0.3× 159 2.3× 138 2.0× 187 2.8× 90 1.0k
Gye‐Rae Tack South Korea 16 38 0.4× 44 0.6× 173 2.5× 46 0.7× 60 0.9× 114 838
Joon Yul Choi South Korea 19 35 0.3× 13 0.2× 107 1.6× 59 0.9× 47 0.7× 68 1.2k
Eveline Huber United Kingdom 15 132 1.2× 118 1.7× 254 3.7× 56 0.8× 4 0.1× 24 996
E. J. van der Schee Netherlands 13 141 1.3× 71 1.0× 125 1.8× 17 0.3× 14 0.2× 18 1.0k
J. L. Grashuis Netherlands 18 168 1.6× 66 0.9× 216 3.2× 13 0.2× 254 3.8× 31 1.4k
Péter Bogner Hungary 15 37 0.3× 95 1.3× 91 1.3× 55 0.8× 66 1.0× 63 799
Rob M. Heethaar Netherlands 12 84 0.8× 34 0.5× 234 3.4× 10 0.1× 10 0.1× 19 1.1k
Dennis Silage United States 15 195 1.8× 56 0.8× 66 1.0× 16 0.2× 13 0.2× 41 682

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Smith. The network helps show where Robert W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert W. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert W. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert W. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert W. Smith. Robert W. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Housh, Terry J., et al.. (2024). The Effects of Anchoring a Fatiguing Forearm Flexion Task to a High vs. Low Rating of Perceived Exertion on Torque and Neuromuscular Responses. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 38(5). e219–e225. 3 indexed citations
2.
3.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2024). Are performance and perceived fatigability dependent on the anchor scheme of fatiguing isometric tasks in men?. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 64(6). 505–515. 1 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2024). The effects of sustained, low- and high-intensity isometric tasks on performance fatigability and the perceived responses that contributed to task termination. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 124(5). 1587–1599. 1 indexed citations
5.
6.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2023). Utilizing the RPE-Clamp model to examine interactions among factors associated with perceived fatigability and performance fatigability in women and men. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 123(6). 1397–1409. 3 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2023). The Effects of Anchor Schemes on Performance Fatigability, Neuromuscular Responses and the Perceived Sensations That Contributed to Task Termination. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 8(2). 49–49. 4 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2022). No effect of coactivation on fatigue-induced decreases in isokinetic and isometric torque in healthy young male adults. Human Movement Science. 86. 103002–103002. 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2021). Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Relationships Between Skinfold Thicknesses Obtained by Ultrasonography and Body Fat Estimates Produced by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University). 2(13). 27. 1 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2021). Cross‐sectional and longitudinal associations between subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry fat mass. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 41(6). 514–522. 3 indexed citations
12.
Stratton, Matthew T., et al.. (2021). Longitudinal agreement of four bioimpedance analyzers for detecting changes in raw bioimpedance during purposeful weight gain with resistance training. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 75(7). 1060–1068. 35 indexed citations
13.
Tinsley, Grant M., et al.. (2020). A Field-based Three-Compartment Model Derived from Ultrasonography and Bioimpedance for Estimating Body Composition Changes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 53(3). 658–667. 6 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Robert W., E. B. Rampe, B. Horgan, E. Dehouck, & R. V. Morris. (2017). The composition of secondary amorphous phases under different environmental conditions. AGUFM. 2017. 1 indexed citations
15.
Sutherland, Rebecca, et al.. (2012). A constricting differential--a case of severe anaemia, weight loss and pericarditis due to Tropheryma whipplei infection. QJM. 107(11). 927–929. 4 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Robert W.. (2005). What Is Homeland Security? Developing a Definition Grounded in the Curricula. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 11(3). 233–246. 4 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (2001). Treatment of a saphenous vein graft to right ventricle fistula with a PTFE‐covered stent: A case report. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 54(4). 531–532. 2 indexed citations
18.
Sahl, Jack D., et al.. (1994). Exposure to 60 Hz magnetic fields in the electric utility work environment. Bioelectromagnetics. 15(1). 21–32. 44 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Robert W., et al.. (1964). THE EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF MULTISENSOR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations
20.
Liberson, W.T. & Robert W. Smith. (1955). The use of an FM tape recorder for pen and ink recording of fast EEG and EMG frequency components. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 7(4). 649–652. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christopher M. Kenyon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Renée Lampe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gye‐Rae Tack Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joon Yul Choi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eveline Huber Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. J. van der Schee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. L. Grashuis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Péter Bogner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rob M. Heethaar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dennis Silage
Rankless by CCL
2026