Robert T. Schatz

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 746 citations indexed

About

Robert T. Schatz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert T. Schatz has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 746 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Robert T. Schatz's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). Robert T. Schatz is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). Robert T. Schatz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Nigeria and Japan. Robert T. Schatz's co-authors include Ervin Staub, Howard Lavine, Nancy Sullivan, Susan T. Fiske and Pamela I. Ansburg and has published in prestigious journals such as Political Psychology, International Journal of Intercultural Relations and Language & Communication.

In The Last Decade

Robert T. Schatz

12 papers receiving 656 citations

Hit Papers

On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind Versus Con... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert T. Schatz United States 8 586 245 177 66 60 13 746
Samuel Pehrson United Kingdom 13 688 1.2× 279 1.1× 158 0.9× 60 0.9× 56 0.9× 22 785
Edwin Poppe Netherlands 12 839 1.4× 443 1.8× 144 0.8× 61 0.9× 61 1.0× 16 964
Nadim N. Rouhana United States 19 1.1k 1.9× 224 0.9× 230 1.3× 62 0.9× 26 0.4× 37 1.2k
Rezarta Bilali United States 15 634 1.1× 316 1.3× 107 0.6× 23 0.3× 74 1.2× 42 749
Clara Sabbagh Israel 14 349 0.6× 181 0.7× 113 0.6× 166 2.5× 20 0.3× 47 636
James McEvoy Australia 8 438 0.7× 269 1.1× 108 0.6× 49 0.7× 22 0.4× 51 812
Rosemarie Mielke Germany 6 927 1.6× 529 2.2× 95 0.5× 40 0.6× 76 1.3× 22 1.1k
Juan Antonio Pérez Spain 16 481 0.8× 354 1.4× 50 0.3× 55 0.8× 59 1.0× 53 714
Andreas Klink Germany 5 659 1.1× 361 1.5× 61 0.3× 27 0.4× 52 0.9× 6 783
Iva Katzarska‐Miller United States 11 449 0.8× 272 1.1× 66 0.4× 214 3.2× 136 2.3× 33 752

Countries citing papers authored by Robert T. Schatz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert T. Schatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert T. Schatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert T. Schatz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert T. Schatz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert T. Schatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert T. Schatz. The network helps show where Robert T. Schatz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert T. Schatz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert T. Schatz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert T. Schatz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert T. Schatz. Robert T. Schatz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Schatz, Robert T.. (2023). Perceptions of efficacy and socio-political activism.. Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). 1 indexed citations
2.
Schatz, Robert T.. (2020). A Review and Integration of Research on Blind and Constructive Patriotism. 613–631. 12 indexed citations
3.
Schatz, Robert T. & Pamela I. Ansburg. (2019). Advising psychology majors about graduate school in psychology: Current practices and challenges.. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. 6(1). 36–45. 4 indexed citations
4.
Schatz, Robert T.. (2018). A Review and Integration of Research on Blind and Constructive Patriotism. 1–19. 12 indexed citations
5.
Sullivan, Nancy & Robert T. Schatz. (2009). Effects of Japanese national identification on attitudes toward learning English and self-assessed English proficiency. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 33(6). 486–497. 19 indexed citations
6.
Schatz, Robert T. & Howard Lavine. (2007). Waving the Flag: National Symbolism, Social Identity, and Political Engagement*. Political Psychology. 28(3). 329–355. 74 indexed citations
8.
Sullivan, Nancy & Robert T. Schatz. (1999). When cultures collide: The official language debate. Language & Communication. 19(4). 261–275. 3 indexed citations
9.
Schatz, Robert T., Ervin Staub, & Howard Lavine. (1999). On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind Versus Constructive Patriotism. Political Psychology. 20(1). 151–174. 521 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
11.
Schatz, Robert T. & Ervin Staub. (1997). Manifestations of blind and constructive patriotism: Personality correlates and individual–group relations.. 77 indexed citations
12.
Schatz, Robert T.. (1994). On being a good American: Blind versus constructive patriotism. ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst). 10(2). 7 indexed citations
13.
Schatz, Robert T. & Susan T. Fiske. (1992). International Reactions to the Threat of Nuclear War: The Rise and Fall of Concern in the Eighties. Political Psychology. 13(1). 1–1. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026