Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Epidemiology of Trauma Deaths
19951.5k citationsAngela Sauaia, Frederick A. Moore et al.PubMedprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Read more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Read. The network helps show where Robert Read may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Read
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Read.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Read based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Read. Robert Read is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Read, Robert, et al.. (2012). Binding Growth Constraints in Small Island Economies : Evidence Focusing On the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).3 indexed citations
Perdikis, Nicholas & Robert Read. (2005). The WTO and the regulation of international trade : recent trade disputes between the European Union and the United States. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).4 indexed citations
8.
Read, Robert. (2005). Book Review: T. E. Josling and T. G. Taylor (eds), Banana Wars: The Anatomy of a Trade Dispute. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
9.
Read, Robert & Nigel Driffield. (2004). Linkages & Flow-On Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment in Pacific Island Economies : Final Report. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
Read, Robert. (1998). Trade, competition and market structure in small states: the role of contestability. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).8 indexed citations
Moore, Kevin W. & Robert Read. (1996). Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Part II. Diagnosis and management. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).25 indexed citations
14.
Moore, Kevin W. & Robert Read. (1996). Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs - Part I. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University).47 indexed citations
15.
Sauaia, Angela, et al.. (1995). Epidemiology of Trauma Deaths. PubMed. 38(2). 185–193.1511 indexed citations breakdown →
Read, Robert, Ernest E. Moore, Frederick A. Moore, Virginia S. Carl, & Anirban Banerjee. (1993). Platelet-activating factor-induced polymorphonuclear neutrophil priming independent of CD11b adhesion.. PubMed. 114(2). 308–13.21 indexed citations
19.
Read, Robert. (1993). Osteochondrosis and elbow arthrosis in young dogs: incidence, diagnosis and management. 3(2). 2–10.2 indexed citations
20.
Read, Robert & Matthew McQueen. (1987). Prospects for ACP Exports to the Enlarged Community. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.