Robert R. Moss

1.8k total citations
16 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Robert R. Moss is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert R. Moss has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 14 papers in Epidemiology and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Robert R. Moss's work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (14 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers). Robert R. Moss is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (14 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (14 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (4 papers). Robert R. Moss collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Denmark and United States. Robert R. Moss's co-authors include John G. Webb, Christopher Thompson, Brad Munt, Karin H. Humphries, Anson Cheung, Jian Ye, David Wood, Mélanie Freeman, Stefan Toggweiler and Jonathon Leipsic and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Robert R. Moss

16 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert R. Moss Canada 13 1.0k 830 300 262 252 16 1.0k
Pratik Manandhar United States 12 590 0.6× 395 0.5× 153 0.5× 88 0.3× 176 0.7× 45 627
Steven C. Cassidy United States 11 280 0.3× 325 0.4× 192 0.6× 92 0.4× 203 0.8× 22 528
Alison Knauth United States 7 303 0.3× 496 0.6× 338 1.1× 49 0.2× 234 0.9× 8 650
Hugues Dessy Belgium 13 226 0.2× 437 0.5× 220 0.7× 103 0.4× 219 0.9× 35 565
Peter Haworth United Kingdom 10 309 0.3× 165 0.2× 134 0.4× 88 0.3× 105 0.4× 18 384
P. Meimoun France 20 1.5k 1.5× 458 0.6× 127 0.4× 758 2.9× 662 2.6× 67 1.6k
Rodolfo A. Neirotti United States 12 261 0.3× 571 0.7× 387 1.3× 46 0.2× 270 1.1× 39 698
L. Achtem Canada 10 338 0.3× 221 0.3× 109 0.4× 35 0.1× 77 0.3× 19 385
Jana Lewandowski Germany 13 546 0.5× 287 0.3× 175 0.6× 25 0.1× 347 1.4× 16 653
Tracy Curran United States 9 265 0.3× 324 0.4× 138 0.5× 61 0.2× 72 0.3× 21 429

Countries citing papers authored by Robert R. Moss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert R. Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert R. Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert R. Moss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert R. Moss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert R. Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert R. Moss. The network helps show where Robert R. Moss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert R. Moss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert R. Moss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert R. Moss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert R. Moss. Robert R. Moss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Blanke, Philipp, Christopher Naoum, John G. Webb, et al.. (2015). Multimodality Imaging in the Context of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 8(10). 1191–1208. 119 indexed citations
2.
Ye, Jian, Anson Cheung, Michael H. Yamashita, et al.. (2015). Transcatheter Aortic and Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation for Failed Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 8(13). 1735–1744. 95 indexed citations
3.
Leipsic, Jonathon, Gidon Perlman, Dion Stub, et al.. (2015). A Strategy of Underexpansion and Ad Hoc Post-Dilation of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Patients at Risk of Annular Injury. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 8(13). 1727–1732. 20 indexed citations
4.
Moss, Robert R., Mann Chandavimol, Bradley Munt, et al.. (2014). Contractile reserve induced with dobutamine echocardiography predicts outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and mitral regurgitation.. PubMed. 23(2). 177–83. 1 indexed citations
5.
Freeman, Mélanie, John G. Webb, Alexander B. Willson, et al.. (2013). Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis–patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. 7(4). 248–255. 13 indexed citations
6.
Willson, Alexander B., John G. Webb, Mélanie Freeman, et al.. (2012). Computed tomography–based sizing recommendations for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable valves: Comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and rationale for implementation in a prospective trial. Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. 6(6). 406–414. 77 indexed citations
7.
Toggweiler, Stefan, Karin H. Humphries, May Lee, et al.. (2012). 5-Year Outcome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 61(4). 413–419. 225 indexed citations
8.
Nietlispach, Fabian, Mark Johnson, Robert R. Moss, et al.. (2010). Transcatheter Closure of Paravalvular Defects Using a Purpose-Specific Occluder. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 3(7). 759–765. 91 indexed citations
9.
Moss, Robert R., et al.. (2010). Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Aortic Stenosis: The Role of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 24(1). 15–27. 36 indexed citations
10.
Moss, Robert R., Sanjeevan Pasupati, Karin H. Humphries, et al.. (2008). Role of Echocardiography in Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 1(1). 15–24. 170 indexed citations
11.
Boone, Robert, Lukas Altwegg, Jean‐Bernard Masson, et al.. (2008). Abstract 3044: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in 168 High-Risk Patients with Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis - Single Centre Experience. Circulation. 118(suppl_18). 2 indexed citations
12.
Ye, Jian, Anson Cheung, Samuel V. Lichtenstein, et al.. (2008). Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 1-year outcome in 26 patients. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 137(1). 167–173. 70 indexed citations
13.
Moss, Robert R., et al.. (2007). Multisite Infective Endocarditis with Widespread Pulmonary and Systemic Embolization in the Setting of Overwhelming Staphylococcal Sepsis. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 20(11). 1318.e1–1318.e4. 3 indexed citations
14.
Munt, Bradley, et al.. (2007). Pericardial disease: what the general cardiologist needs to know. Heart. 93(8). 993–1000. 26 indexed citations
15.
Munt, Brad, Karin H. Humphries, Min Gao, Robert R. Moss, & Christopher Thompson. (2006). True versus reported waiting times for valvular aortic stenosis surgery. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 22(6). 497–502. 12 indexed citations
16.
Moss, Robert R., Karin H. Humphries, Min Gao, et al.. (2003). Outcome of Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement: A Comparison by Propensity Score Analysis. Circulation. 108(10_suppl_1). II90–7. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026