Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A comparative survey of WLAN location fingerprinting methods
2009413 citationsTommi Perälä, Simo Ali‐Löytty et al.profile →
A Survey of Selected Indoor Positioning Methods for Smartphones
2016389 citationsPavel Davidson, Robert Pichéprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Piché's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Piché with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Piché more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Piché. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Piché. The network helps show where Robert Piché may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Piché
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Piché.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Piché based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Piché. Robert Piché is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Piché, Robert, et al.. (2018). Distance measures for classification of numerical features. Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University).1 indexed citations
3.
Nurminen, Henri, et al.. (2016). An efficient indoor positioning particle filter using a floor-plan based proposal distribution. Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University. 541–548.7 indexed citations
4.
Piché, Robert. (2016). Cramér-Rao lower bound for linear filtering with t-distributed measurement noise. Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University. 536–540.3 indexed citations
5.
Piché, Robert, et al.. (2016). A systematic approach for Kalman-type filtering with non-Gaussian noises. Trepo - Institutional Repository of Tampere University. 1853–1858.5 indexed citations
Müller, Philipp, et al.. (2014). A field test of parametric WLAN-fingerprint-positioning methods. International Conference on Information Fusion. 1–8.10 indexed citations
Kanniainen, Juho, Saku Mäkinen, Robert Piché, & Alok K. Chakrabarti. (2011). Forecasting the Diffusion of Innovation: A Stochastic Bass Model with Log-Normal and Mean-Reverting Error Process. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
12.
Perälä, Tommi, et al.. (2009). A comparative survey of WLAN location fingerprinting methods. 243–251.413 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Pesonen, Henri & Robert Piché. (2009). Bayesian Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring Technique. 420–425.3 indexed citations
Piché, Robert & Juho Kanniainen. (2007). Solving financial differential equations using differentiation matrices. World Congress on Engineering. 1016–1022.6 indexed citations
17.
Piché, Robert, et al.. (2003). Closed-Form Solutions for Hybrid Cellular/GPS Positioning. Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS/GNSS 2003). 1613–1619.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.