Robert M. Hovis

743 total citations
6 papers, 450 citations indexed

About

Robert M. Hovis is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert M. Hovis has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 450 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Robert M. Hovis's work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers) and Abdominal Surgery and Complications (2 papers). Robert M. Hovis is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers) and Abdominal Surgery and Complications (2 papers). Robert M. Hovis collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert M. Hovis's co-authors include Daniel Mullady, Steven A. Edmundowicz, Lawrence Waldbaum, Sreenivasa S. Jonnalagadda, Riad R. Azar, Dayna S. Early, Gregory A. Coté, Michael Ansstas, Vladimir Kushnir and Christine E. Hovis and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.

In The Last Decade

Robert M. Hovis

6 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert M. Hovis United States	5	309	210	133	115	60	6	450
Lawrence Waldbaum United States	4	286 0.9×	156 0.7×	127 1.0×	90 0.8×	79 1.3×	5	399
Massimo Agostoni Italy	11	358 1.2×	324 1.5×	54 0.4×	152 1.3×	20 0.3×	22	519
Gowri Gouda United States	9	205 0.7×	114 0.5×	40 0.3×	84 0.7×	29 0.5×	11	283
T. Coady United Kingdom	10	243 0.8×	128 0.6×	159 1.2×	94 0.8×	42 0.7×	13	418
Maria Manolaraki Greece	12	429 1.4×	309 1.5×	237 1.8×	180 1.6×	23 0.4×	18	696
Lisa B. Mahoney United States	11	106 0.3×	133 0.6×	70 0.5×	28 0.2×	63 1.1×	25	340
Stefan Lauer Germany	11	123 0.4×	169 0.8×	103 0.8×	61 0.5×	64 1.1×	18	334
Şener Demiroluk Türkiye	12	167 0.5×	201 1.0×	160 1.2×	99 0.9×	25 0.4×	31	341
I. Cigarini France	6	85 0.3×	276 1.3×	197 1.5×	72 0.6×	33 0.6×	10	395
Sook Young Lee South Korea	11	169 0.5×	193 0.9×	67 0.5×	49 0.4×	33 0.6×	40	338

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Hovis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Hovis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Hovis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Hovis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Hovis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Hovis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Hovis. The network helps show where Robert M. Hovis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert M. Hovis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert M. Hovis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert M. Hovis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert M. Hovis. Robert M. Hovis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

Smith, Zachary L., Daniel Mullady, Gabriel Lang, et al.. (2018). A randomized controlled trial evaluating general endotracheal anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP in high-risk patients. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 89(4). 855–862. 58 indexed citations

Wani, Sachin, Riad R. Azar, Christine E. Hovis, et al.. (2011). Obesity as a risk factor for sedation-related complications during propofol-mediated sedation for advanced endoscopic procedures. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 74(6). 1238–1247. 105 indexed citations

Maple, John T., Rajesh N. Keswani, Robert M. Hovis, et al.. (2009). Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 70(2). 278–283. 41 indexed citations

Coté, Gregory A., Robert M. Hovis, Michael Ansstas, et al.. (2009). Incidence of Sedation-Related Complications With Propofol Use During Advanced Endoscopic Procedures. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 8(2). 137–142. 209 indexed citations

Keswani, Rajesh N., Robert M. Hovis, Steven A. Edmundowicz, et al.. (2008). Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Insufflation during ERCP for the Reduction of Post-procedure Pain: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Double-blind Controlled Trial. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 67(5). AB107–AB107. 3 indexed citations

Read, Thomas E., Scott E. Henry, Robert M. Hovis, et al.. (2002). Prospective Evaluation of Anesthetic Technique for Anorectal Surgery. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 45(11). 1553–1560. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact