Róbert Koiss

500 total citations
9 papers, 75 citations indexed

About

Róbert Koiss is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Oncology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Róbert Koiss has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 75 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Epidemiology, 3 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Róbert Koiss's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper). Róbert Koiss is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper). Róbert Koiss collaborates with scholars based in Hungary, Denmark and Estonia. Róbert Koiss's co-authors include Gábor Sobel, Csaba Jeney, Balázs Járay, Zsuzsa Schaff, Tibor Takács, István P. Székely, Tamás Ferenci, Hung‐Cheng Lai, Zsuzsa Schaff and I Boncz and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Cancer, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and Pathology & Oncology Research.

In The Last Decade

Róbert Koiss

9 papers receiving 71 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Róbert Koiss Hungary	4	43	30	29	10	9	9	75
Caroline Vail United States	5	28 0.7×	15 0.5×	28 1.0×	25 2.5×	11 1.2×	6	91
Martina Oberländer Germany	6	5 0.1×	22 0.7×	29 1.0×	13 1.3×	6 0.7×	10	71
Tanja Steiner United Kingdom	3	13 0.3×	11 0.4×	32 1.1×	12 1.2×	7 0.8×	3	84
Nicholas Pirius United States	5	24 0.6×	18 0.6×	25 0.9×	8 0.8×	33 3.7×	5	88
Thilo Doerk Germany	4	16 0.4×	24 0.8×	38 1.3×	12 1.2×	23 2.6×	6	76
Harish Rotti India	5	14 0.3×	33 1.1×	64 2.2×	12 1.2×	8 0.9×	7	96
Xiaojia Gao China	4	10 0.2×	26 0.9×	67 2.3×	16 1.6×	5 0.6×	5	81
Monica Lewis United States	4	16 0.4×	21 0.7×	47 1.6×	14 1.4×	3 0.3×	6	78
V.B. Grinberg United States	1	20 0.5×	44 1.5×	16 0.6×	39 3.9×	5 0.6×	3	104

Countries citing papers authored by Róbert Koiss

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Róbert Koiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Róbert Koiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Róbert Koiss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Róbert Koiss

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Róbert Koiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Róbert Koiss. The network helps show where Róbert Koiss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Róbert Koiss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Róbert Koiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Róbert Koiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Róbert Koiss. Róbert Koiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Leeson, Simon, Andrea Ciavattini, Mihaela Grigore, et al.. (2024). Reproducibility of colposcopy quality indicators—A survey among members of the European Federation for Colposcopy. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(9). 1745–1752. 2 indexed citations

2.

Kovács, Attila, et al.. (2017). [Quality and performance indicators of the pilot program for cervical cancer screening by health visitors].. PubMed. 61(4). 361–367. 1 indexed citations

3.

Kovács, Attila, et al.. (2017). A védőnői méhnyakszűrési pilot program értékelése | Assessment of the pilot program for cervical cancer screening by health visitors. 2 indexed citations

4.

Kovács, Attila, et al.. (2017). A védőnői méhnyakszűrési pilot program értékelése. Orvosi Hetilap. 158(12). 461–467. 1 indexed citations

5.

Koiss, Róbert, I Boncz, Zoltán Hernádi, & Zoltán Szentirmay. (2017). Javaslat a hazai méhnyakszűrési eljárásrend korszerűsítésére. Orvosi Hetilap. 158(52). 2062–2067. 4 indexed citations

6.

Döbrőssy, Lajos & Róbert Koiss. (2016). "Gynaecological cancer screening" or "cervical screening?" The case of Hungary.. PubMed. 37(4). 445–450. 1 indexed citations

7.

Varga, Norbert, Helen Keegan, Christine White, et al.. (2016). The Value of a Novel Panel of Cervical Cancer Biomarkers for Triage of HPV Positive Patients and for Detecting Disease Progression. Pathology & Oncology Research. 23(2). 295–305. 11 indexed citations

8.

Takács, Tibor, Csaba Jeney, Zsuzsa Schaff, et al.. (2016). Performance of a new HPV and biomarker assay in the management of hrHPV positive women: Subanalysis of the ongoing multicenter TRACE clinical trial (n > 6,000) to evaluate POU4F3 methylation as a potential biomarker of cervical precancer and cancer. International Journal of Cancer. 140(5). 1119–1133. 37 indexed citations

9.

Koiss, Róbert, Attila Kovács, Balázs Járay, et al.. (2015). Claudin-1 as a Biomarker of Cervical Cytology and Histology. Pathology & Oncology Research. 22(1). 179–188. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact