Robert Judge

752 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Robert Judge is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Communication and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Judge has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Ocean Engineering, 2 papers in Communication and 2 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in Robert Judge's work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers) and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (2 papers). Robert Judge is often cited by papers focused on Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers) and Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (2 papers). Robert Judge collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Robert Judge's co-authors include Ryan Brown, Gayle S. W. Hagler, Michael Davis, Motria Caudill, Ronald Williams, Ken Buckley, Wan Jiao, Ron Williams, Tien Dat Nguyen and Murray E. Jennex and has published in prestigious journals such as Atmospheric measurement techniques, International Journal of Knowledge Management and RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.

In The Last Decade

Robert Judge

8 papers receiving 430 citations

Hit Papers

Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluat... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert Judge United States 4 398 332 144 84 57 9 449
Ryan Brown United States 6 473 1.2× 398 1.2× 180 1.3× 105 1.3× 66 1.2× 7 517
Motria Caudill United States 3 339 0.9× 355 1.1× 127 0.9× 64 0.8× 52 0.9× 4 437
Rebecca Tanzer United States 4 374 0.9× 344 1.0× 145 1.0× 77 0.9× 80 1.4× 5 431
Barbiere Maurizio Italy 5 329 0.8× 238 0.7× 101 0.7× 85 1.0× 66 1.2× 7 397
Georgia Miskell New Zealand 12 342 0.9× 309 0.9× 134 0.9× 117 1.4× 35 0.6× 14 408
Ivan Lazović Serbia 9 212 0.5× 257 0.8× 55 0.4× 47 0.6× 38 0.7× 27 410
Sriniwasa P. N. Kumar United States 3 494 1.2× 361 1.1× 149 1.0× 105 1.3× 80 1.4× 3 545
Brandon Feenstra United States 11 486 1.2× 432 1.3× 235 1.6× 102 1.2× 108 1.9× 18 580
Andrew Morris United Kingdom 7 319 0.8× 271 0.8× 94 0.7× 86 1.0× 82 1.4× 14 438
Anikender Kumar India 10 356 0.9× 376 1.1× 141 1.0× 160 1.9× 144 2.5× 13 549

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Judge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Judge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Judge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Judge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Judge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Judge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Judge. The network helps show where Robert Judge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Judge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Judge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Judge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Judge. Robert Judge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Williams, Ron, et al.. (2018). Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 11(8). 4605–4615. 75 indexed citations
2.
Jiao, Wan, Gayle S. W. Hagler, Ronald Williams, et al.. (2016). Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-costsensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern UnitedStates. Atmospheric measurement techniques. 9(11). 5281–5292. 350 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Judge, Robert, et al.. (2012). Analysis of success factors in supplier development. 4(4). 289–289. 14 indexed citations
4.
Jennex, Murray E., et al.. (2010). Achieving Electric Restoration Logistical Efficiencies During Critical Infrastructure Crisis Response. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2(3). 36–50. 1 indexed citations
5.
Judge, Robert. (2009). A Simulation System for Evaluating Knowledge Management System (KMS)Implementation Strategies in Small to Mid-Size Enterprises (SME). International Journal of Knowledge Management. 5(2). 1–20. 2 indexed citations
7.
Judge, Robert, et al.. (2006). The Use of Probabilistic Analysis for Estimation of Drilling Time and Costs When Evaluating Economic Benefits of New Technologies. Proceedings of IADC/SPE Drilling Conference. 1 indexed citations
8.
Judge, Robert, et al.. (2003). The Economic Analysis of a Two-Rig Approach to Drill in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Using Dual Gradient Pumping Technology. Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 1 indexed citations
9.
Judge, Robert, et al.. (2003). Deploying Dual Gradient Drilling Technology on a Purpose-Built Rig for Drilling Upper Hole Sections. Proceedings of SPE/IADC Drilling Conference. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026