Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Lessons in modelling and management of marine ecosystems: the Atlantis experience
2011454 citationsElizabeth A. Fulton, Jason S. Link et al.Fish and Fisheriesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Gamble
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Gamble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Gamble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Gamble more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Gamble
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Gamble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Gamble. The network helps show where Robert J. Gamble may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert J. Gamble
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert J. Gamble.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert J. Gamble based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert J. Gamble. Robert J. Gamble is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Townsend, Howard, Christopher Harvey, Kerim Aydin, et al.. (2014). Report of the 3rd National Ecosystem Modeling Workshop (NEMoW 3) : mingling models for marine resource management, multiple model inference.11 indexed citations
Link, Jason S., Robert J. Gamble, & Elizabeth A. Fulton. (2011). NEUS--Atlantis construction, calibration, and application of an ecosystem model with ecological interactions, physiographic conditions, and fleet behavior.14 indexed citations
11.
Link, Jason S., Robert J. Gamble, & Michael J. Fogarty. (2011). An overview of the NEFSC's ecosystem modeling enterprise for the northeast US shelf large marine ecosystem : towards ecosystem-based fisheries management.9 indexed citations
12.
Fulton, Elizabeth A., Jason S. Link, Isaac C. Kaplan, et al.. (2011). Lessons in modelling and management of marine ecosystems: the Atlantis experience. Fish and Fisheries. 12(2). 171–188.454 indexed citations breakdown →
Gamble, Robert J., et al.. (2008). An Aggregate and MS Production Model: A Simulator Tool.1 indexed citations
15.
Gamble, Robert J., et al.. (2006). Independent Flow Regimes in the Southern McMurdo and Ross Ice Shelves - New Evidence from Velocity Analysis of Landsat Images and Numerical Modelling.1 indexed citations
16.
Wilkins, Julia & Robert J. Gamble. (2000). An Examination of Gender Differences among Teachers in Jamaican Schools.. Multicultural education. 7(4). 18–20.4 indexed citations
Gamble, Robert J.. (1986). Simple equations in physics. European Journal of Science Education. 8(1). 27–37.6 indexed citations
20.
Gamble, Robert J.. (1985). Early environmental factors reported by amateur tennis players. University Microfilms International eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.