Robert Halliday

1.4k citations
42 papers · 937 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Halliday

40 papers receiving 896 citations

Peers

Robert Halliday
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Gastroenterology 97
  • Developmental Neuroscience 50
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 199
  • Surgery 429
  • Urology 59
Replace Hugh W. Grant with:
Hugh W. Grant United Kingdom
Alexander J. Rogers United States
Fouad Ziade Lebanon
Son Moon Shin South Korea
Robert E. Sapién United States
Sean D. Firth United States
Bettina Bohnhorst Germany
Kristina Thorngren‐Jerneck Sweden
R. Jokela Finland
Wendy L. Wright United States
Robert Halliday relative to Hugh W. Grant United Kingdom Hugh W. Grant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Hugh W. Grant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Halliday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Halliday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Halliday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Halliday. The network helps show where Robert Halliday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Halliday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Halliday Line = papers co-authored together Robert Halliday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995105
2 198894
3 200875
4 201273
5 200358
6 200948
7 201038
8 201433
9 200733
10 201433
11 201529
12 201226
13 200825
14 201023
15 200323
16 201023
17 201321
18
Rehabilitation and the narcotic addict: results of a comparative methadone withdrawal program.
196719
19 201416
20 200215

About Robert Halliday

Robert Halliday is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (16 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (11 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (9 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (8 papers), Infant Nutrition and Health (5 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (97 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (50 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (199 citations), Surgery (429 citations) and Urology (59 citations). Robert Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Walker, Nadia Badawi, A.J.A. Holland, J Moore-Gillon, Joan K. Morris, M R Law, David Isaacs, David S. Winlaw, Gary F. Sholler and J A Walker‐Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Surgery, The Journal of Pediatrics, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, Archives of Disease in Childhood and BMJ Paediatrics Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact