Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
History of the Mediterranean salinity crisis
1977831 citationsKenneth J. Hsü, L. Montadert et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Garrison
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Garrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Garrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Garrison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Garrison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Garrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Garrison. The network helps show where Robert E. Garrison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Garrison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Garrison.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Garrison based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Garrison. Robert E. Garrison is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Föllmi, Karl B. & Robert E. Garrison. (1991). Phosphatic sediments, ordinary or extraordinary deposits ? The example of the Miocene Monterey Formation (California). 55–84.23 indexed citations
Blome, Charles D., et al.. (1983). Radiolarian biostratigraphy of Hawasina complex, northern Oman. AAPG Bulletin.1 indexed citations
10.
Glenn, Craig R., Robert E. Garrison, & Arthur Arthur. (1983). Late Cretaceous multicolored shales and phosphatic sedimentary rocks in Egypt. AAPG Bulletin.1 indexed citations
Garrison, Robert E., et al.. (1981). The Monterey Formation and related siliceous rocks of California : proceedings of an SEPM Research Symposium dedicated to examine the paleontology, sedimentology, depositional environments, and diagenesis of the Monterey Formation. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
13.
Garrison, Robert E.. (1981). Pelagic and Hemipelagic Sedimentation in Active Margin Basins. 15–38.5 indexed citations
Hsü, Kenneth J., L. Montadert, Daniel Bernoulli, et al.. (1977). History of the Mediterranean salinity crisis. Nature. 267(5610). 399–403.831 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Murray, James W., et al.. (1971). Structure and Origin of Foreslope Hills, Fraser Delta, British Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 19(3). 589–600.10 indexed citations
17.
Waters, A. C., et al.. (1970). Matrix characteristics and origin of lunar breccia samples 12034 and 12073. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 2. 893.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.