Robert E. Fenzl

489 total citations
10 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Robert E. Fenzl is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert E. Fenzl has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 7 papers in Ophthalmology and 6 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Robert E. Fenzl's work include Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers). Robert E. Fenzl is often cited by papers focused on Corneal surgery and disorders (9 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers). Robert E. Fenzl collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert E. Fenzl's co-authors include Diane L. Van Horn, Thomas M. Aaberg, Robert Machemer, James P. Gills, Albert C. Neumann, Robert H. Osher, Paul Ernest, Kevin T. Lavery and Richard C. Troutman and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Robert E. Fenzl

10 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert E. Fenzl United States	9	302	288	119	71	27	10	370
Felix N. Sabates United States	10	236 0.8×	309 1.1×	74 0.6×	52 0.7×	26 1.0×	17	370
Yu Sawada Japan	9	208 0.7×	329 1.1×	34 0.3×	105 1.5×	14 0.5×	23	383
Maria Fernanda Abalem United States	12	132 0.4×	249 0.9×	58 0.5×	151 2.1×	15 0.6×	41	357
Spyridon Dimopoulos Germany	12	209 0.7×	366 1.3×	32 0.3×	152 2.1×	34 1.3×	39	428
Sunan Chaidhawangul United States	7	163 0.5×	243 0.8×	56 0.5×	58 0.8×	55 2.0×	8	295
Hector E. Ibanez United States	9	275 0.9×	463 1.6×	49 0.4×	83 1.2×	49 1.8×	13	514
Elisete Brandão Portugal	14	237 0.8×	415 1.4×	26 0.2×	106 1.5×	19 0.7×	36	480
Julia Beutel Germany	10	244 0.8×	334 1.2×	11 0.1×	85 1.2×	36 1.3×	17	377
Srini Goverdhan United Kingdom	10	260 0.9×	360 1.3×	29 0.2×	89 1.3×	8 0.3×	20	424
Stephen Bylsma United States	5	213 0.7×	292 1.0×	16 0.1×	64 0.9×	6 0.2×	6	331

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Fenzl

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Fenzl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Fenzl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Fenzl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Fenzl

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Fenzl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Fenzl. The network helps show where Robert E. Fenzl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Fenzl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Fenzl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Fenzl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Fenzl. Robert E. Fenzl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Gills, James P. & Robert E. Fenzl. (2002). Piggyback Intraocular Lens Implantation. Developments in ophthalmology. 34. 209–216. 15 indexed citations

2.

Fenzl, Robert E. & James P. Gills. (2000). Piggyback intraocular lens implantation. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 11(1). 73–76. 16 indexed citations

3.

Gills, James P. & Robert E. Fenzl. (1999). Minus-power intraocular lenses to correct refractive errors in myopic pseudophakia. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 25(9). 1205–1208. 17 indexed citations

4.

Fenzl, Robert E.. (1998). Refractive and visual outcome of hyperopic cataract cases operated on before and after implementation of the Holladay II formula. Ophthalmology. 105(9). 1759–1764. 52 indexed citations

5.

Gills, James P. & Robert E. Fenzl. (1996). Analysis of Astigmatic Keratotomy With a 5.0-mm Optical Clear Zone; EDITOR:. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 121(6). 731–731. 1 indexed citations

6.

Ernest, Paul, et al.. (1995). Relative stability of clear corneal incisions in a cadaver eye model. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 21(1). 39–42. 56 indexed citations

7.

Neumann, Albert C., Robert H. Osher, & Robert E. Fenzl. (1984). Radial keratotomy: A comprehensive evaluation. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 56(3). 275–301. 54 indexed citations

8.

Troutman, Richard C., Albert C. Neumann, Robert H. Osher, & Robert E. Fenzl. (1983). Radial Keratotomy. Cornea. 2(1). 47???56–47???56. 10 indexed citations

9.

Fenzl, Robert E., et al.. (1983). Evaluation of semiflexible and flexible anterior chamber intraocular lenses. American Intra-Ocular Implant Society Journal. 9(1). 42–44. 8 indexed citations

10.

Horn, Diane L. Van, Thomas M. Aaberg, Robert Machemer, & Robert E. Fenzl. (1977). Glial Cell Proliferation In Human Retinal Detachment with Massive Periretinal Proliferation. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 84(3). 383–393. 141 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact