This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Dixon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Dixon. The network helps show where Robert Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Dixon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Dixon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Dixon. Robert Dixon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dixon, Robert. (2016). National Literatures, Scale and the Problem of the World. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature. 15(3). 1.2 indexed citations
3.
Dixon, Robert. (2013). What do mass attenders believe?: Contemporary cultural change and the acceptance of key catholic beliefs and moral teachings by Australian mass attenders. 90(4). 439.3 indexed citations
4.
Dixon, Robert. (2013). Australian literature and the world republic of letters. 3.
5.
Dixon, Robert. (2012). Invitation to the Voyage: Reading Gail Jones' Five Bells. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature. 12(3). 1.2 indexed citations
6.
Dixon, Robert, John Freebairn, & G. C. Lim. (2011). Net flows in the U.S. labor market, 1990-2010. Monthly labor review. 134(2).7 indexed citations
7.
Dixon, Robert. (2008). Australian Literature and the New Empiricism: A reponse to Paul Eggert, "Australian Classics and the Price of Books". Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature. 158–162.1 indexed citations
8.
Dixon, Robert. (2008). Ghosts in the Machine: Modernity and the Unmodern in Gail Jones's Dreams of Speaking. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 8. 121–137.3 indexed citations
9.
Dixon, Robert & John Freebairn. (2007). Trends in Regional Specialisation in Australia. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 15(3). 281.9 indexed citations
10.
Dixon, Robert. (2007). REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE SEVERITY OF RECESSIONS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Australasian journal of regional studies. 13(3). 351.2 indexed citations
Dixon, Robert, et al.. (2005). An Examination of Net Flows in the Australian Labour Market. Australian journal of labour economics. 8(1). 25–42.4 indexed citations
13.
Dixon, Robert. (2005). Tim Winton, Cloudstreet and the Field of Australian Literature. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 50. 245–260.6 indexed citations
14.
Dixon, Robert & G. C. Lim. (2004). The Incidence of Long-Term Unemployment in Australia 1978-2003. Minerva Access (University of Melbourne). 7(4). 501–513.4 indexed citations
Dixon, Robert. (2002). Changes over Time in Male Participation Rates in Australia. Australian journal of labour economics. 5(3). 419–430.1 indexed citations
19.
Dixon, Robert, et al.. (2001). Authority and influence: Australian literary criticism 1950-2000. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.