Robert D. Hancock

12.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
240 papers, 10.3k citations indexed

About

Robert D. Hancock is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert D. Hancock has authored 240 papers receiving a total of 10.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 89 papers in Materials Chemistry, 79 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 77 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Robert D. Hancock's work include Metal complexes synthesis and properties (75 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (68 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (47 papers). Robert D. Hancock is often cited by papers focused on Metal complexes synthesis and properties (75 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (68 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (47 papers). Robert D. Hancock collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and United Kingdom. Robert D. Hancock's co-authors include Arthur E. Martell, Joseph H. Reibenspies, Jan C. A. Boeyens, Ramunas J. Motekaitis, Fabrizio Marsicano, Gloria J. McDougall, Susan M. Dobson, Peter W. Wade, Hee‐Seung Lee and Ann Evers and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Chemical Society Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Robert D. Hancock

238 papers receiving 9.7k citations

Hit Papers

Ligand design for selective complexation of metal ions in... 1989 2026 2001 2013 1989 1996 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert D. Hancock United States 52 4.0k 3.7k 2.8k 2.6k 2.3k 240 10.3k
Russell S. Drago United States 62 5.2k 1.3× 4.5k 1.2× 2.7k 1.0× 6.2k 2.4× 2.1k 0.9× 375 14.2k
Andrea Bencini Italy 50 3.9k 1.0× 2.2k 0.6× 3.3k 1.2× 2.7k 1.0× 3.6k 1.5× 322 9.2k
Roger Guilard France 51 9.9k 2.5× 4.4k 1.2× 1.4k 0.5× 3.6k 1.4× 1.5k 0.7× 515 14.1k
Daryle H. Busch United States 58 4.5k 1.1× 4.1k 1.1× 5.0k 1.8× 4.9k 1.9× 1.5k 0.6× 370 11.7k
Henry Taube United States 56 3.9k 1.0× 4.0k 1.1× 3.7k 1.3× 6.2k 2.4× 1.1k 0.5× 365 14.5k
Jerald S. Bradshaw United States 52 3.9k 1.0× 2.5k 0.7× 1.4k 0.5× 6.1k 2.4× 8.3k 3.5× 390 15.8k
Tai‐Chu Lau Hong Kong 56 3.5k 0.9× 2.8k 0.8× 1.5k 0.5× 2.6k 1.0× 695 0.3× 271 10.5k
Christian Huber Germany 25 3.5k 0.9× 2.6k 0.7× 943 0.3× 3.0k 1.1× 1.4k 0.6× 75 10.1k
Graham A. Bowmaker New Zealand 50 3.5k 0.9× 2.6k 0.7× 1.5k 0.5× 2.7k 1.0× 658 0.3× 268 10.2k
Leone Spiccia Australia 70 12.3k 3.1× 2.9k 0.8× 2.7k 1.0× 2.4k 0.9× 751 0.3× 392 23.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Hancock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Hancock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Hancock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Hancock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Hancock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Hancock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Hancock. The network helps show where Robert D. Hancock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert D. Hancock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert D. Hancock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert D. Hancock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert D. Hancock. Robert D. Hancock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
4.
Lee, Hyunjung, et al.. (2013). Mechanism of chelation enhanced fluorescence in complexes of cadmium(ii), and a possible new type of anion sensor. Chemical Communications. 49(84). 9749–9749. 49 indexed citations
5.
Hancock, Robert D.. (2012). The pyridyl group in ligand design for selective metal ion complexation and sensing. Chemical Society Reviews. 42(4). 1500–1524. 309 indexed citations
6.
Reibenspies, Joseph H., et al.. (2011). Complexation of Metal Ions, Including Alkali-Earth and Lanthanide(III) Ions, in Aqueous Solution by the Ligand 2,2′,6′,2′′-Terpyridyl. Inorganic Chemistry. 50(7). 2764–2770. 54 indexed citations
7.
Gephart, R.T., Neil J. Williams, Joseph H. Reibenspies, A. Sousa, & Robert D. Hancock. (2008). Metal Ion Complexing Properties of the Highly Preorganized Ligand 2,9-bis(Hydroxymethyl)-1,10-phenanthroline: A Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Study. Inorganic Chemistry. 47(22). 10342–10348. 40 indexed citations
8.
Cockrell, G.M., Gang Zhang, Donald G. VanDerveer, Randolph P. Thummel, & Robert D. Hancock. (2008). Enhanced Metal Ion Selectivity of 2,9-Di-(pyrid-2-yl)-1,10-phenanthroline and Its Use as a Fluorescent Sensor for Cadmium(II). Journal of the American Chemical Society. 130(4). 1420–1430. 183 indexed citations
9.
10.
Hancock, Robert D., Dale Shouse, Fred Schauer, et al.. (2003). AFRL Combustion Science Branch Research Activities and Capabilities. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 10. 39–39. 2 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Carolyn J., Christy S. John, Robert D. Hancock, et al.. (1995). N,N′-Ethylene-di-l-Cysteine (EC) complexes of Ga(III) and In(III): Molecular modeling, thermodynamic stability and in vivo studies. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 22(2). 165–173. 36 indexed citations
13.
Sousa, A. & Robert D. Hancock. (1995). Convenient syntheses, based on cyclohexene oxide, of ligands that are highly preorganised for metal ion size-based selectivity. Journal of the Chemical Society Chemical Communications. 415–415. 24 indexed citations
14.
Hosken, Gladys D. & Robert D. Hancock. (1994). Very strong and selective complexation of small metal lons by a highly preorganised open-chain bispidine-based ligand. Journal of the Chemical Society Chemical Communications. 1363–1363. 31 indexed citations
15.
Linder, Peter, et al.. (1993). Evaluation of a New Chelating Agent for Cadmium: A Preliminary Report. Human & Experimental Toxicology. 12(3). 247–251. 1 indexed citations
16.
Adams, M.D., Peter W. Wade, & Robert D. Hancock. (1990). Extraction of aurocyanide ion-pairs by poly(oxyethylene) extractants. Talanta. 37(9). 875–883. 26 indexed citations
17.
Adams, M.D., Gloria J. McDougall, & Robert D. Hancock. (1987). Models for the adsorption of aurocyanide onto activated carbon. Part III: Comparison between the extraction of aurocyanide by activated carbon, polymeric adsorbents and 1-pentanol. Hydrometallurgy. 19(1). 95–115. 62 indexed citations
18.
Hancock, Robert D. & M. Patrick Ngwenya. (1987). The effect of increase in chelate ring size beyond six-membered on the metal ion size selectivity patterns of tetra-aza macrocycles. Journal of the Chemical Society Dalton Transactions. 2911–2911. 22 indexed citations
19.
Hancock, Robert D.. (1986). ChemInform Abstract: Factors Influencing the Coordination Chemistry of Metal Ions in Aqueous Solutions. Chemischer Informationsdienst. 17(18). 2 indexed citations
20.
Boeyens, Jan C. A., et al.. (1983). Optimum ligand hole sizes for stabilizing nickel(III). Structure of the nickel(III) complex of 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N',N"-triacetate. Inorganic Chemistry. 22(24). 3489–3490. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026