Robert Comment

3.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
11 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Robert Comment is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Comment has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Accounting, 7 papers in Strategy and Management and 4 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Robert Comment's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers). Robert Comment is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers). Robert Comment collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert Comment's co-authors include Gregg A. Jarrell and G. William Schwert and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Journal of applied corporate finance.

In The Last Decade

Robert Comment

8 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Corporate focus and stock returns 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 1995 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert Comment United States 6 1.9k 835 711 515 69 11 2.0k
Kathleen P. Fuller United States 15 1.9k 1.0× 1.0k 1.2× 681 1.0× 490 1.0× 69 1.0× 42 2.1k
Teresa A. John United States 11 1.2k 0.7× 851 1.0× 495 0.7× 414 0.8× 31 0.4× 16 1.5k
Mike Stegemoller United States 14 2.2k 1.2× 1.1k 1.3× 637 0.9× 566 1.1× 75 1.1× 31 2.4k
Chad J. Zutter United States 17 1.6k 0.8× 635 0.8× 480 0.7× 387 0.8× 44 0.6× 34 1.7k
Ronan Powell Ireland 15 1.2k 0.6× 403 0.5× 490 0.7× 351 0.7× 44 0.6× 40 1.3k
Thomas S. Zorn United States 11 1.3k 0.7× 558 0.7× 557 0.8× 372 0.7× 57 0.8× 27 1.5k
Larry Y. Dann United States 13 1.7k 0.9× 1.0k 1.3× 640 0.9× 462 0.9× 35 0.5× 15 1.9k
Vinay B. Nair United States 12 1.2k 0.6× 656 0.8× 397 0.6× 306 0.6× 29 0.4× 22 1.4k
Katharina Lewellen United States 16 1.2k 0.6× 609 0.7× 406 0.6× 408 0.8× 39 0.6× 28 1.4k
Yuanto Kusnadi Singapore 13 1.3k 0.7× 391 0.5× 477 0.7× 274 0.5× 66 1.0× 35 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Comment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Comment's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Comment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Comment more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Comment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Comment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Comment. The network helps show where Robert Comment may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Comment

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Comment. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Comment based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Comment. Robert Comment is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Comment, Robert. (2015). How Much Do Expatriate Earnings and Repatriation Taxes Matter to Shareholders?. Journal of applied corporate finance. 27(3). 122–130. 2 indexed citations
2.
Comment, Robert. (2012). Revisiting the Illiquidity Discount for Private Companies: A New (and “Skeptical”) Restricted‐Stock Study. Journal of applied corporate finance. 24(1). 80–91. 9 indexed citations
3.
4.
Comment, Robert. (2011). Business Valuation, DLOM and Daubert: The Issue of Redundancy. SSRN Electronic Journal.
5.
Comment, Robert. (2010). A Note on the Disposition of Auction-Rate Securities by Non-Financial Corporate Investors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
6.
Comment, Robert. (2010). Business Valuation, DLOM, and Daubert: The Issue of Redundancy. Business Valuation Review. 29(3). 83–96.
7.
Comment, Robert & Gregg A. Jarrell. (1995). Corporate focus and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics. 37(1). 67–87. 803 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Comment, Robert & G. William Schwert. (1995). Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures. Journal of Financial Economics. 39(1). 3–43. 574 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Comment, Robert & Gregg A. Jarrell. (1991). The Relative Signalling Power of Dutch-Auction and Fixed-Price Self-Tender Offers and Open-Market Share Repurchases. The Journal of Finance. 46(4). 1243–1243. 86 indexed citations
10.
Comment, Robert & Gregg A. Jarrell. (1991). The Relative Signalling Power of Dutch‐Auction and Fixed‐Price Self‐Tender Offers and Open‐Market Share Repurchases. The Journal of Finance. 46(4). 1243–1271. 473 indexed citations
11.
Comment, Robert & Gregg A. Jarrell. (1987). Two-tier and negotiated tender offers: The imprisonment of the free-riding shareholder. Journal of Financial Economics. 19(2). 283–310. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026