Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3
2022403 citationsChristian Bierlich, Smita Chakraborty et al.Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Verheyen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Verheyen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Verheyen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Verheyen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Verheyen. The network helps show where Rob Verheyen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob Verheyen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob Verheyen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob Verheyen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rob Verheyen. Rob Verheyen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beekveld, Melissa van, Mrinal Dasgupta, Basem Kamal El-Menoufi, et al.. (2024). Introduction to the PanScales framework, version 0.1. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).7 indexed citations
Bierlich, Christian, Smita Chakraborty, Nishita Desai, et al.. (2022). Codebase release 8.3 for PYTHIA. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).13 indexed citations
Bierlich, Christian, Smita Chakraborty, Nishita Desai, et al.. (2022). A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3. Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä).403 indexed citations breakdown →
Otten, Sydney, S. Caron, Melissa van Beekveld, et al.. (2021). . UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).53 indexed citations
13.
Salam, Gavin P., et al.. (2021). Spin correlations in final-state parton showers and jet observables. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).39 indexed citations
Otten, Sydney, S. Caron, Melissa van Beekveld, et al.. (2019). Event Generation and Statistical Sampling with Deep Generative Models and a Density Information Buffer. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
17.
Otten, Sydney, Luc Hendriks, Melissa van Beekveld, et al.. (2019). Event Generation and Statistical Sampling with Deep Generative Models. arXiv (Cornell University).
18.
Kleiss, Ronald & Rob Verheyen. (2016). Competing Sudakov veto algorithms. The European Physical Journal C. 76(7).11 indexed citations
19.
Verheyen, Rob, et al.. (2015). ERK-niveau van leerlingen ondergewaardeerd: Uitkomsten van een internationaal ijkingsonderzoek. 102(8). 4–8.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.