Rob van Gestel

548 total citations
30 papers, 158 citations indexed

About

Rob van Gestel is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Rob van Gestel has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 158 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Law, 16 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 7 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Rob van Gestel's work include Comparative and International Law Studies (16 papers), European and International Law Studies (11 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (7 papers). Rob van Gestel is often cited by papers focused on Comparative and International Law Studies (16 papers), European and International Law Studies (11 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (7 papers). Rob van Gestel collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy. Rob van Gestel's co-authors include Hans‐W. Micklitz, Gijs van Dijck, Edward L. Rubin, Miguel Poiares Maduro, J.M. Verschuuren, Marc Hertogh, Willem van Boom, M.S. Groenhuijsen and Vanessa Mak and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Law Journal and Common Market Law Review.

In The Last Decade

Rob van Gestel

22 papers receiving 135 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Rob van Gestel Netherlands	9	80	60	28	26	22	30	158
E.M.H. Hirsch Ballin Netherlands	6	36 0.5×	59 1.0×	16 0.6×	41 1.6×	10 0.5×	55	154
Francesca Bignami United States	7	38 0.5×	72 1.2×	28 1.0×	39 1.5×	7 0.3×	30	118
Markku Suksi Finland	8	46 0.6×	145 2.4×	18 0.6×	65 2.5×	13 0.6×	23	193
Bruno Zeller Australia	6	39 0.5×	36 0.6×	32 1.1×	18 0.7×	5 0.2×	61	98
Christian Djeffal Germany	5	23 0.3×	37 0.6×	26 0.9×	26 1.0×	57 2.6×	23	126
W.J.M. Voermans Netherlands	7	74 0.9×	109 1.8×	40 1.4×	32 1.2×	4 0.2×	62	195
Ashley S. Deeks United States	8	20 0.3×	98 1.6×	12 0.4×	32 1.2×	36 1.6×	30	164
Abbe Brown United Kingdom	5	25 0.3×	35 0.6×	13 0.5×	24 0.9×	8 0.4×	31	123
Anthony J. Sebok United States	7	71 0.9×	41 0.7×	16 0.6×	26 1.0×	5 0.2×	41	128
Sjef van Erp Russia	5	59 0.7×	52 0.9×	22 0.8×	19 0.7×	3 0.1×	58	127

Countries citing papers authored by Rob van Gestel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob van Gestel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob van Gestel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob van Gestel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob van Gestel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob van Gestel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob van Gestel. The network helps show where Rob van Gestel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob van Gestel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob van Gestel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob van Gestel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rob van Gestel. Rob van Gestel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2019). Rehabilitatie van de vakpublicatie. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 94(42). 3152–3160.

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2019). Evaluating Academic Legal Research in Europe: The Advantage of Lagging Behind. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 4 indexed citations

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2019). In the Court We Trust: Cooperation, Coordination and Collaboration between the ECJ and Supreme Administrative Courts. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2018). Evidence-Based Regulation and the Translation from Empirical Data to Normative Choices: A Proportionality Test. Erasmus Law Review. 11(2). 120–133. 1 indexed citations

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2017). Print Save Cite Citation Alert (off) Email Share Supreme administrative courts’ preliminary questions to the CJEU: start of a dialogue or talking to deaf ears?. 6(2). 122–142.

Gestel, Rob van, Hans‐W. Micklitz, & Edward L. Rubin. (2017). Rethinking Legal Scholarship. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 13 indexed citations

Mak, Vanessa, et al.. (2016). Privaatrechtelijke rechtsvorming, regulering en wetenschap 0.13. Research portal (Tilburg University). 2016(28). 1962–1969.

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2016). Putting evidence-based law making to the test: judicial review of legislative rationality. Research portal (Tilburg University). 4(2). 155–185. 8 indexed citations

Boom, Willem van & Rob van Gestel. (2015). Rechtwetenschappelijk Onderzoek -- Uitkomsten Van Een Landelijke Enquête (Legal Research -- Results of a National Survey). SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

10.

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2015). Urgenda: roekeloze rechtspraak of rechtsvinding 3.0?. Research portal (Tilburg University). 2598–2605. 4 indexed citations

11.

Gestel, Rob van. (2014). Primacy of the European legislature: Delegated rule-making and the decline of the "transmission belt" theory. Research portal (Tilburg University). 33–59. 2 indexed citations

12.

Gestel, Rob van. (2014). Sense and non-sense of a European ranking of law schools and law journals. Legal Studies. 35(1). 165–185. 7 indexed citations

13.

Gestel, Rob van & Hans‐W. Micklitz. (2013). European integration through standardization: How judicial review is breaking down the club house of private standardization bodies. Common Market Law Review. 50(1). 145–181. 11 indexed citations

14.

Gestel, Rob van & Hans‐W. Micklitz. (2013). Why Methods Matter in European Legal Scholarship. European Law Journal. 20(3). 292–316. 19 indexed citations

15.

Gestel, Rob van. (2012). Kaderwetgeving en de verstrooiing van de wetgevende macht. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3(27). 155–171.

16.

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2011). Assessing Legal Research: Sense and Nonsense of Peer Review versus Bibliometrics and the Need for a European Approach. German Law Journal. 12(3). 901–929. 11 indexed citations

17.

Verschuuren, J.M. & Rob van Gestel. (2009). Conclusions: A Conditional Yes to Ex Ante Evaluation of Legislation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2 indexed citations

18.

Verschuuren, J.M. & Rob van Gestel. (2009). Ex Ante Evaluation of Legislation: An Introduction. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

19.

Gestel, Rob van. (2007). Evidence-based lawmaking and the quality of legislation : Regulatory impact assessments in the European Union and the Netherlands. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 139–165. 7 indexed citations

20.

Gestel, Rob van, et al.. (2006). Loopholes, risks and ambivalences in international lawmaking: the case of a framework convention on victims' rights. Netherlands yearbook of international law. 37. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact