Rob Tinch

2.0k total citations
37 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Rob Tinch is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Rob Tinch has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 13 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 11 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Rob Tinch's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (8 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (7 papers). Rob Tinch is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (8 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (7 papers). Rob Tinch collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Norway. Rob Tinch's co-authors include Sybille van den Hove, Allan Watt, Juliette Young, Simo Sarkki, Jari Niemelä, Claire W. Armstrong, Naomi S. Foley, María C. Uyarra, David Viner and Andrew R. Watkinson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Ecological Economics and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Rob Tinch

35 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rob Tinch United Kingdom 18 683 347 302 255 244 37 1.4k
Robin Kundis Craig United States 21 750 1.1× 378 1.1× 446 1.5× 270 1.1× 167 0.7× 138 1.6k
Sybille van den Hove Spain 21 1.2k 1.7× 414 1.2× 464 1.5× 365 1.4× 277 1.1× 36 2.2k
Steven M. Alexander Canada 24 961 1.4× 355 1.0× 406 1.3× 531 2.1× 114 0.5× 48 1.8k
Elizabeth McNie United States 9 829 1.2× 498 1.4× 259 0.9× 154 0.6× 111 0.5× 10 1.5k
Denise Lach United States 20 595 0.9× 471 1.4× 270 0.9× 151 0.6× 111 0.5× 47 1.4k
Julie A. Winkler United States 27 1.2k 1.8× 169 0.5× 208 0.7× 304 1.2× 243 1.0× 80 2.3k
Ulrich Heink Germany 12 605 0.9× 136 0.4× 221 0.7× 215 0.8× 138 0.6× 14 1.1k
Simo Sarkki Finland 25 1.0k 1.5× 437 1.3× 389 1.3× 250 1.0× 205 0.8× 89 1.9k
Carolina Adler Switzerland 18 766 1.1× 419 1.2× 243 0.8× 174 0.7× 99 0.4× 43 1.7k
Prue Addison United Kingdom 20 693 1.0× 176 0.5× 597 2.0× 485 1.9× 318 1.3× 35 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Tinch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Tinch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Tinch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Tinch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Tinch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Tinch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Tinch. The network helps show where Rob Tinch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rob Tinch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rob Tinch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rob Tinch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rob Tinch. Rob Tinch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tinch, Rob, Isaac Ankamah‐Yeboah, & Claire W. Armstrong. (2022). Exploring Perspectives of the Validity, Legitimacy and Acceptability of Environmental Valuation using Q Methodology. Munin Open Research Archive (The Arctic University of Norway). 8(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Hynes, Stephen, Claire W. Armstrong, Isaac Ankamah‐Yeboah, et al.. (2021). Have environmental preferences and willingness to pay remained stable before and during the global Covid-19 shock?. Ecological Economics. 189. 107142–107142. 28 indexed citations
3.
Chen, Wenting, Philip Wallhead, Stephen Hynes, et al.. (2021). Ecosystem service benefits and costs of deep-sea ecosystem restoration. Journal of Environmental Management. 303. 114127–114127. 17 indexed citations
4.
Tinch, Rob, R.J.F. Bugter, Małgorzata Blicharska, et al.. (2018). Arguments for biodiversity conservation: factors influencing their observed effectiveness in European case studies. Biodiversity and Conservation. 27(7). 1763–1788. 5 indexed citations
5.
Bugter, R.J.F., Paula A. Harrison, John Haslett, & Rob Tinch. (2018). Making a better case for biodiversity conservation: the BESAFE project. Biodiversity and Conservation. 27(7). 1549–1560. 8 indexed citations
6.
Tinch, Rob, et al.. (2016). Catchment management in England and Wales: the role of arguments for ecosystems and their services. Biodiversity and Conservation. 27(7). 1639–1658. 20 indexed citations
7.
Tinch, Rob, Estelle Balian, David N. Carss, et al.. (2016). Science-policy interfaces for biodiversity: dynamic learning environments for successful impact. Biodiversity and Conservation. 27(7). 1679–1702. 38 indexed citations
8.
Sarkki, Simo, Rob Tinch, Jari Niemelä, et al.. (2015). Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces. Environmental Science & Policy. 54. 505–512. 116 indexed citations
9.
Dunford, R. W., Paula A. Harrison, Jill Jäger, Mark Rounsevell, & Rob Tinch. (2014). Exploring climate change vulnerability across sectors and scenarios using indicators of impacts and coping capacity. Climatic Change. 128(3-4). 339–354. 52 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Minpeng, Fu Sun, Pam Berry, et al.. (2014). Integrated assessment of China’s adaptive capacity to climate change with a capital approach. Climatic Change. 128(3-4). 367–380. 20 indexed citations
11.
Sarkki, Simo, Jari Niemelä, Rob Tinch, et al.. (2013). Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces. Science and Public Policy. 41(2). 194–206. 155 indexed citations
12.
McVittie, Alistair, Luke Brander, Alfred Wagtendonk, et al.. (2011). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: the Quantitative Assessment. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 6 indexed citations
13.
Hull, Stephen, et al.. (2010). MB0104: Determining How and What to Take Into Account in the Planning of Marine Protected Area Networks : Socio-economic Data. 1 indexed citations
14.
Tinch, Rob, et al.. (2006). Successful approaches to sustainable procurement. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 2 indexed citations
15.
Beaumont, Nicola & Rob Tinch. (2004). Abatement cost curves: a viable management tool for enabling the achievement of win–win waste reduction strategies?. Journal of Environmental Management. 71(3). 207–215. 35 indexed citations
16.
Bateman, Ian J., et al.. (2003). Assessing the willingness to pay for maintained and improved water supplies in Mexico City. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 1–31. 17 indexed citations
17.
Allison, Edward H., et al.. (2002). Sustainable Livelihoods from Fluctuating Fisheries, Final Technical Report.. 1 indexed citations
18.
Tinch, Rob. (2001). Transport and environment: policy directions for europe. European Environment. 11(3). 151–162. 1 indexed citations
19.
Peterson, Garry, Giulio A. De Leo, Jessica J. Hellmann, et al.. (1997). Uncertainty, Climate Change, and Adaptive Management. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 46 indexed citations
20.
Tinch, Rob, et al.. (1969). XXIIIrd Scientific Meeting of the Blood Research Institute. Vox Sanguinis. 17(1). 19–78. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026