Countries citing papers authored by R.O. Bangerter
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R.O. Bangerter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.O. Bangerter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.O. Bangerter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.O. Bangerter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.O. Bangerter. The network helps show where R.O. Bangerter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.O. Bangerter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.O. Bangerter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.O. Bangerter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R.O. Bangerter. R.O. Bangerter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Seidl, P.A., R.O. Bangerter, C.M. Celata, et al.. (2001). Overview of the scientific objectives of the high current experiment of \nheavy-ion fusion. eScholarship (California Digital Library).9 indexed citations
3.
Meier, W.R., J.J. Barnard, & R.O. Bangerter. (2001). A 3.3 MJ, Rb+1 driver design based on an integrated systems analysis. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 464(1-3). 433–439.14 indexed citations
4.
Bangerter, R.O., Ronald C. Davidson, W.B. Herrmannsfeldt, et al.. (2000). The Heavy Ion Fusion Program in the U.S.A.. eScholarship (California Digital Library).
5.
Bangerter, R.O.. (1998). The U.S. heavy-ion fusion program. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 415(1-2). 3–10.9 indexed citations
Bangerter, R.O., Chun Fai Chan, A. Faltens, et al.. (1996). Physics design and scaling of Elise. Fusion Engineering and Design. 32-33. 323–335.8 indexed citations
8.
Kwan, J.W., R.O. Bangerter, A. Faltens, et al.. (1996). Elise plans and progress. Fusion Engineering and Design. 32-33. 299–308.4 indexed citations
Bangerter, R.O. & A. Faltens. (1994). Induction Linacs for Heavy Ion Fusion. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 21.1 indexed citations
11.
Bangerter, R.O., C.M. Celata, A. Faltens, et al.. (1994). Elise: The Next step in development of induction heavy ion drivers for inertial fusion energy. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 14–18.
Reiser, M., Terry F. Godlove, & R.O. Bangerter. (1986). Heavy ion inertial fusion : Washington, DC, 1986. American Institute of Physics eBooks.1 indexed citations
Mark, J.W.K., R.O. Bangerter, W.M. Fawley, Shimeng Yu, & D.L. Judd. (1982). Some proposed disk heating, focusing, and beam-transport experiments for heavy-ion inertial-fusion test facilities. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
Bangerter, R.O.. (1976). ERDA summer study of heavy ions for inertial fusion, Claremont Hotel, Oakland/Berkeley, California, July 19-30, 1976 : final report, December 1976.
18.
Bangerter, R.O.. (1969). NONLEPTONIC DECAY OF SIGMA HYPERONS. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
19.
Mast, Terry S., M. Alston‐Garnjost, R.O. Bangerter, et al.. (1968). Electromagnetic Decay of theY0*(1520). Physical Review Letters. 21(25). 1715–1717.29 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.