RM Charnley

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

RM Charnley is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Hepatology. According to data from OpenAlex, RM Charnley has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Oncology, 18 papers in Surgery and 13 papers in Hepatology. Recurrent topics in RM Charnley's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (15 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (12 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (6 papers). RM Charnley is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (15 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (12 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (6 papers). RM Charnley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. RM Charnley's co-authors include R. Stangl, A. Altendorf-Hofmann, J. Scheele, David L. Morris, J Doran, Keith Seymour, J D Hardcastle, Kofi Oppong, Rajiv Lochan and Ashley R. Dennison and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Gut and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

RM Charnley

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Factors influencing the natural history of colorectal liv... 1994 2026 2004 2015 1994 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
RM Charnley United Kingdom 13 729 672 513 276 144 39 1.2k
Akio Saiura Japan 20 548 0.8× 867 1.3× 563 1.1× 266 1.0× 147 1.0× 55 1.2k
Joseph Espat United States 10 367 0.5× 587 0.9× 346 0.7× 419 1.5× 195 1.4× 14 1.0k
Fabio Procopio Italy 20 635 0.9× 1.1k 1.6× 747 1.5× 316 1.1× 111 0.8× 75 1.3k
Inne Borel-Rinkes Netherlands 8 480 0.7× 477 0.7× 312 0.6× 302 1.1× 115 0.8× 11 843
Serena Langella Italy 19 619 0.8× 807 1.2× 625 1.2× 312 1.1× 116 0.8× 62 1.1k
Lourens Bester Australia 20 608 0.8× 846 1.3× 498 1.0× 548 2.0× 306 2.1× 42 1.4k
Angela Palmisano Italy 17 440 0.6× 805 1.2× 508 1.0× 208 0.8× 111 0.8× 44 1.0k
J. IJzermans Netherlands 14 308 0.4× 370 0.6× 356 0.7× 216 0.8× 66 0.5× 31 775
Nadia Russolillo Italy 24 852 1.2× 1.1k 1.6× 837 1.6× 393 1.4× 136 0.9× 72 1.6k
Kazuto Inoue Japan 22 860 1.2× 712 1.1× 883 1.7× 515 1.9× 87 0.6× 67 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by RM Charnley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of RM Charnley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RM Charnley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RM Charnley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by RM Charnley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by RM Charnley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RM Charnley. The network helps show where RM Charnley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of RM Charnley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of RM Charnley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of RM Charnley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with RM Charnley. RM Charnley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moir, John, et al.. (2020). Validation of the PROTRACT proforma - standardising radiological reporting of pancreatic cancers. HPB. 22. S330–S330. 1 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Pamela, et al.. (2017). Endoscopic cystic duct stent as primary treatment for intrahepatic gallbladder perforation with abscess formation. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 99(4). e128–e130. 3 indexed citations
4.
John, S.K.P., Stuart Robinson, Sara Rehman, et al.. (2013). Prognostic Factors and Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis in the Era of Preoperative Chemotherapy: An 11-Year Single-Centre Study. Digestive Surgery. 30(4-6). 293–301. 51 indexed citations
5.
Charnley, RM, et al.. (2009). Fast-Track Management of Patients Undergoing Proximal Pancreatic Resection. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 91(3). 201–204. 11 indexed citations
7.
Manas, D, et al.. (2005). A matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor to treat unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. HPB. 7(4). 289–291. 6 indexed citations
8.
Midwinter, Mark J., et al.. (2002). Prospective comparison of modern imaging modalities in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic and periampullary tumours. British journal of surgery. 89(3). 375–375. 3 indexed citations
9.
Seymour, Keith, RM Charnley, John Rose, Christine J. Baudouin, & Derek Manas. (2002). Preoperative portal vein embolisation for primary and metastatic liver tumours: volume effects, efficacy, complications and short‐term outcome. HPB. 4(1). 21–28. 4 indexed citations
10.
Midwinter, Mark J., Alexander Watson, V. Wadehra, & RM Charnley. (2001). Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage cytology and immunocytology in pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma. HPB. 3(3). 207–211. 3 indexed citations
11.
Curtis, Ann, et al.. (1999). Mutations of cationic trypsinogen in chronic pancreatitis. The Lancet. 354(9186). 1302–1302. 1 indexed citations
12.
Seymour, Keith, et al.. (1999). Selection of metastatic tumour phenotypes by host immune systems. The Lancet. 354(9194). 1989–1991. 12 indexed citations
13.
Charnley, RM, Anjan K. Banerjee, S. C. Whitaker, Robert E. Spiller, & J Doran. (1995). Peritoneal seeding of pancreatic cancer following transperitoneal biliary procedures. British journal of surgery. 82(3). 393–393. 4 indexed citations
14.
Stangl, R., A. Altendorf-Hofmann, RM Charnley, & J. Scheele. (1994). Factors influencing the natural history of colorectal liver metastases. The Lancet. 343(8910). 1405–1410. 549 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Charnley, RM, Michael G. Thomas, & David L. Morris. (1991). EFFECT OF HEPATIC CRYOTHERAPY ON SERUM CEA CONCENTRATION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INOPERABLE HEPATIC METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL CANCER. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 61(1). 55–58. 17 indexed citations
16.
Charnley, RM, David L. Morris, Ashley R. Dennison, S S Amar, & J D Hardcastle. (1991). Detection of colorectal liver metastases using intraoperative ultrasonography. British journal of surgery. 78(1). 45–48. 56 indexed citations
17.
Ballantyne, K C, RM Charnley, Alan C. Perkins, et al.. (1990). Hepatic perfusion index in the diagnosis of overt metastatic colorectal cancer. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 11(1). 23–28. 20 indexed citations
18.
Charnley, RM, J P Sheffield, & J D Hardcastle. (1990). Evaluation of a Biopsy Gun for Guided Biopsy of Impalpable Liver Lesions Using Intraoperative Utrasound. HPB Surgery. 2(4). 265–267. 1 indexed citations
19.
Charnley, RM, et al.. (1990). Rectal endosonography for the visualisation of the anastomosis after anterior resection and its relevance to local recurrence. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 5(3). 127–129. 12 indexed citations
20.
Charnley, RM, Michael K. Stehling, F. Evans, et al.. (1988). The British Society of Gastroenterology, 49th meeting. Sheffield, 14-16 September 1988. Abstracts.. Gut. 29(10). A1429–A1496. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026