Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)
2019447 citationsMarcos Zampieri, Shervin Malmasi et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ritesh Kumar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ritesh Kumar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ritesh Kumar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ritesh Kumar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ritesh Kumar. The network helps show where Ritesh Kumar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ritesh Kumar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ritesh Kumar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ritesh Kumar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ritesh Kumar. Ritesh Kumar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zampieri, Marcos, Shervin Malmasi, Preslav Nakov, et al.. (2019). SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval). 75–86.447 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Kumar, Ritesh & Atul Kr. Ojha. (2019). KMI-Panlingua at HASOC 2019: SVM vs BERT for Hate Speech and Offensive Content Detection.. 285–292.3 indexed citations
Kumar, Ritesh, et al.. (2018). TRAC-1 Shared Task on Aggression Identification: IIT(ISM)$@$COLING'18.. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 58–65.13 indexed citations
12.
Kumar, Ritesh, Atul Kr. Ojha, Shervin Malmasi, & Marcos Zampieri. (2018). Benchmarking Aggression Identification in Social Media.. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1–11.224 indexed citations
13.
Kumar, Ritesh, et al.. (2018). Part-of-Speech Annotation of English-Assamese code-mixed texts: Two Approaches. 94–103.1 indexed citations
14.
Zampieri, Marcos, Shervin Malmasi, Preslav Nakov, et al.. (2018). Language Identification and Morphosyntactic Tagging: The Second VarDial Evaluation Campaign. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja. 1–17.65 indexed citations
15.
Kumar, Ritesh, et al.. (2018). Proceedings of the First Workshop on Trolling, Aggression and Cyberbullying (TRAC-2018).91 indexed citations
Kumar, Ritesh. (2014). Developing Politeness Annotated Corpus of Hindi Blogs. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1275–1280.3 indexed citations
18.
Kumar, Ritesh. (2012). Challenges in the development of annotated corpora of computer-mediated communication in Indian Languages: A Case of Hindi. Language Resources and Evaluation. 299–302.1 indexed citations
19.
Kumar, Ritesh, et al.. (2012). Developing a POS tagger for Magahi: A Comparative Study. 105–114.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.