Riju Singhal

445 total citations
9 papers, 373 citations indexed

About

Riju Singhal is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Riju Singhal has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 373 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Riju Singhal's work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). Riju Singhal is often cited by papers focused on Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). Riju Singhal collaborates with scholars based in United States and India. Riju Singhal's co-authors include Gary Friedman, Yury Gogotsi, Elina A. Vitol, Sayan Bhattacharyya, Zulfiya Orynbayeva, Michael G. Schrlau, Ramalingam Venkat Kalyana Sundaram, Jun Niu, Elisabeth S. Papazoglou and Nishith Verma and has published in prestigious journals such as Advanced Materials, Nature Nanotechnology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Riju Singhal

9 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Riju Singhal United States	6	195	110	98	94	76	9	373
Brent Millare United States	11	206 1.1×	163 1.5×	100 1.0×	85 0.9×	76 1.0×	13	531
Wai H. Mak United States	10	228 1.2×	94 0.9×	82 0.8×	152 1.6×	60 0.8×	12	426
M. Daniela Angione Italy	13	176 0.9×	316 2.9×	57 0.6×	100 1.1×	48 0.6×	15	536
Davi H. S. de Camargo Brazil	13	168 0.9×	249 2.3×	53 0.5×	125 1.3×	28 0.4×	20	438
Wendi Zhou China	12	120 0.6×	202 1.8×	121 1.2×	103 1.1×	41 0.5×	17	407
Elisabet Prats‐Alfonso Spain	12	190 1.0×	196 1.8×	108 1.1×	74 0.8×	62 0.8×	23	448
Charlotte Flatebo United States	11	107 0.5×	40 0.4×	139 1.4×	80 0.9×	32 0.4×	16	317
Raluca Voicu Canada	10	154 0.8×	320 2.9×	93 0.9×	248 2.6×	55 0.7×	12	554
Mateusz L. Donten Switzerland	13	76 0.4×	103 0.9×	141 1.4×	89 0.9×	28 0.4×	23	364
Anna Cattani‐Scholz Germany	13	157 0.8×	292 2.7×	168 1.7×	245 2.6×	37 0.5×	30	596

Countries citing papers authored by Riju Singhal

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Riju Singhal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Riju Singhal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Riju Singhal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Riju Singhal

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Riju Singhal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Riju Singhal. The network helps show where Riju Singhal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Riju Singhal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Riju Singhal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Riju Singhal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Riju Singhal. Riju Singhal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Ip, Vincent, et al.. (2021). Reactive ion beam etch of slanted gratings for augmented reality. 2–2. 1 indexed citations

Li, Bin, Riju Singhal, Adam Fontecchio, et al.. (2018). Perfusion double-channel micropipette probes for oxygen flux mapping with single-cell resolution. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 9. 850–860. 1 indexed citations

Singhal, Riju, Vadym N. Mochalin, Maria R. Lukatskaya, Gary Friedman, & Yury Gogotsi. (2012). Separation and liquid chromatography using a single carbon nanotube. Scientific Reports. 2(1). 510–510. 17 indexed citations

Orynbayeva, Zulfiya, Riju Singhal, Elina A. Vitol, et al.. (2011). Physiological validation of cell health upon probing with carbon nanotube endoscope and its benefit for single-cell interrogation. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine. 8(5). 590–598. 21 indexed citations

Singhal, Riju, Zulfiya Orynbayeva, Ramalingam Venkat Kalyana Sundaram, et al.. (2010). Multifunctional carbon-nanotube cellular endoscopes. Nature Nanotechnology. 6(1). 57–64. 199 indexed citations

Singhal, Riju, Sayan Bhattacharyya, Zulfiya Orynbayeva, et al.. (2009). Small diameter carbon nanopipettes. Nanotechnology. 21(1). 15304–15304. 64 indexed citations

Bhattacharyya, Sayan, David Staack, Elina A. Vitol, et al.. (2009). Localized Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles Using Nanoscale Corona Discharge in Aqueous Solutions. Advanced Materials. 21(40). 4039–4044. 25 indexed citations

Gogotsi, Yury, G. Friedman, Elina A. Vitol, & Riju Singhal. (2008). Carbon Nanotube Tipped Cellular Probes. ECS Meeting Abstracts. MA2008-01(30). 1021–1021. 1 indexed citations

Singhal, Riju, Ashutosh Sharma, & Nishith Verma. (2008). Micro−Nano Hierarchal Web of Activated Carbon Fibers for Catalytic Gas Adsorption and Reaction. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 47(10). 3700–3707. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact