Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels.
1992500 citationsHoward M. Loree, Roger D. Kamm et al.Circulation Researchprofile →
A constitutive model for transformation plasticity accompanying strain-induced martensitic transformations in metastable austenitic steels
1992430 citationsRichard Stringfellow et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Stringfellow
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Stringfellow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Stringfellow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Stringfellow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Stringfellow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Stringfellow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Stringfellow. The network helps show where Richard Stringfellow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Stringfellow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Stringfellow.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Stringfellow based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Stringfellow. Richard Stringfellow is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stringfellow, Richard & Patricia Llana. (2007). Detailed Modeling of the Train-to-Train Impact Test: Rail Passenger Equipment Impact Tests. Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation).1 indexed citations
Tyrell, David, et al.. (2003). Locomotive crashworthiness design modifications study. Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation). 1 to 5. 78–87.20 indexed citations
Stringfellow, Richard, et al.. (1995). Locomotive Crashworthiness Research: Volume 1: Model Development and Validation.4 indexed citations
15.
Stringfellow, Richard, et al.. (1995). Locomotive Crashworthiness Research: Volume 3: Review and Discussion of Freight Locomotive Crashworthiness Concepts.1 indexed citations
16.
Stringfellow, Richard, et al.. (1995). Locomotive Crashworthiness Research: Volume 2: Design Concept Generation and Evaluation.2 indexed citations
17.
Stringfellow, Richard, et al.. (1993). Development and application of rail defect fracture models to assess remedial actions. Rosa P: A digital library for transportation research (United States Department of Transportation).5 indexed citations
18.
Loree, Howard M., et al.. (1992). Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels.. Circulation Research. 71(4). 850–858.500 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.