Richard Naab

2.8k total citations
2 papers, 2 citations indexed

About

Richard Naab is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geophysics and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Naab has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 2 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1 paper in Geophysics and 1 paper in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Richard Naab's work include Neutrino Physics Research (1 paper), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (1 paper) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1 paper). Richard Naab is often cited by papers focused on Neutrino Physics Research (1 paper), Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (1 paper) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1 paper). Richard Naab collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Richard Naab's co-authors include Leander Fischer and Alexander Trettin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Instrumentation and Applied Optics.

In The Last Decade

Richard Naab

1 paper receiving 1 citation

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h				Papers	Cites
Richard Naab United Kingdom	2	2	1	1	2	2
D. Sherman Switzerland	2	2 1.0×	1 1.0×	1 1.0×	3	3
D. H. Miller United Kingdom	2	2 1.0×		1 1.0×	2	2
A. Samuel United States	2	2 1.0×		1 1.0×	3	5
J. J. Aguado Spain	2	2 1.0×			2	6
George Philip Krapp	2	2 1.0×			3	5
Danny Oh Singapore	2	2 1.0×			4	5
A. Gilman United Kingdom	2			1 1.0×	2	4
S. Stoica United Kingdom	1				2	2
Yaka Wakabayashi Japan	2				3	4
Ruediger Klein United States	1				2	2

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Naab

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Naab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Naab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Naab more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Naab

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Naab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Naab. The network helps show where Richard Naab may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Naab

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Naab. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Naab based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Naab. Richard Naab is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Fischer, Leander, Richard Naab, & Alexander Trettin. (2023). Treating detector systematics via a likelihood free inference method. Journal of Instrumentation. 18(10). P10019–P10019. 1 indexed citations

2.

Naab, Richard, et al.. (1978). Application of optimum coding sequences to computerized classical tomography. Applied Optics. 17(19). 3133–3133. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact