Richard M. DeGraaf

4.5k total citations
104 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Richard M. DeGraaf is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard M. DeGraaf has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 80 papers in Ecology, 37 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 31 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Richard M. DeGraaf's work include Avian ecology and behavior (41 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (32 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (30 papers). Richard M. DeGraaf is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (41 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (32 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (30 papers). Richard M. DeGraaf collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Richard M. DeGraaf's co-authors include David I. King, Thomas Maier, Mariko Yamasaki, Curtice R. Griffin, W. Matthew Vander Haegen, Stephen DeStefano, Todd K. Fuller, Ronald I. Miller, Robert T. Brooks and Mark T. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Journal of Animal Ecology and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Richard M. DeGraaf

98 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard M. DeGraaf United States 35 2.5k 1.4k 1.1k 433 398 104 3.2k
Richard H. Yahner United States 28 2.4k 0.9× 1.3k 1.0× 633 0.6× 508 1.2× 301 0.8× 117 2.8k
Louis B. Best United States 33 2.5k 1.0× 1.4k 1.0× 664 0.6× 922 2.1× 262 0.7× 92 3.6k
Stanley H. Anderson United States 33 2.8k 1.1× 978 0.7× 892 0.8× 415 1.0× 325 0.8× 145 3.4k
Christopher E. Moorman United States 30 2.1k 0.8× 903 0.7× 1.3k 1.2× 376 0.9× 314 0.8× 171 2.9k
James A. Kushlan United States 31 2.4k 0.9× 1.4k 1.0× 738 0.7× 520 1.2× 225 0.6× 100 3.1k
Susan J. Hannon Canada 38 3.5k 1.4× 1.7k 1.2× 1.1k 1.0× 1.3k 3.0× 572 1.4× 109 4.3k
Alton S. Harestad Canada 20 2.2k 0.9× 763 0.6× 421 0.4× 505 1.2× 386 1.0× 47 2.6k
M. Isabel Bellocq Argentina 24 1.0k 0.4× 964 0.7× 610 0.6× 435 1.0× 337 0.8× 81 1.8k
Matthew D. Johnson United States 25 1.8k 0.7× 970 0.7× 614 0.6× 733 1.7× 490 1.2× 66 2.5k
Beatrice Van Horne United States 25 3.7k 1.5× 2.2k 1.6× 1.0k 1.0× 878 2.0× 779 2.0× 49 4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. DeGraaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. DeGraaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. DeGraaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. DeGraaf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. DeGraaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. DeGraaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. DeGraaf. The network helps show where Richard M. DeGraaf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. DeGraaf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. DeGraaf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. DeGraaf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. DeGraaf. Richard M. DeGraaf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
DeGraaf, Richard M., et al.. (2004). Pathways to comorbidity: the transition of pure mood, anxiety and substance use disorders into comorbid conditions in a longitudinal population-based study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 82(3). 461–467. 94 indexed citations
2.
DeGraaf, Richard M.. (2002). Wildlife-Habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Forest Science. 48(2). 447–449. 52 indexed citations
3.
Maier, Thomas, Michael Marchand, Richard M. DeGraaf, & John A. Litvaitis. (2002). A Subterranean Camera Trigger for Identifying Predators Excavating Turtle Nests. Herpetological review. 33(4). 6 indexed citations
4.
Haegen, W. Matthew Vander & Richard M. DeGraaf. (2002). Daily Energy Expenditure of Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapillus) Feeding Nestlings. The Auk. 119(4). 1173–1179. 1 indexed citations
5.
Haegen, W. Matthew Vander & Richard M. DeGraaf. (2002). Daily Energy Expenditure of Ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapillus) Feeding Nestlings. The Auk. 119(4). 1173–1173. 3 indexed citations
6.
DeGraaf, Richard M. & Mariko Yamasaki. (2002). Effects of Edge Contrast on Redback Salamander Distribution in Even-Aged Northern Hardwoods. Forest Science. 48(2). 351–363. 32 indexed citations
7.
Maier, Thomas & Richard M. DeGraaf. (2000). Predation on Japanese Quail vs. House Sparrow Eggs in Artificial Nests: Small Eggs Reveal Small Predators. Ornithological Applications. 102(2). 325–332. 20 indexed citations
8.
King, David I., Richard M. DeGraaf, Curtice R. Griffin, & Thomas Maier. (1999). Do Predation Rates on Artificial Nests Accurately Reflect Predation Rates on Natural Bird Nests. Journal of Field Ornithology. 70(2). 86 indexed citations
9.
DeGraaf, Richard M., Jay B. Hestbeck, & Mariko Yamasaki. (1998). Associations between breeding bird abundance and stand structure in the White Mountains, New Hampshire and Maine, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 103(2-3). 217–233. 77 indexed citations
10.
Wunderle, Joseph M., Richard M. DeGraaf, & John H. Rappole. (1997). Neotropical Migratory Birds: Natural History, Distribution, and Population Change. Journal of Wildlife Management. 61(3). 980–980. 91 indexed citations
11.
Fuller, Todd K., et al.. (1996). Denning patterns of Porcupines, Erethizon dorsatum. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 110(4). 634–637. 11 indexed citations
12.
DeGraaf, Richard M., et al.. (1996). An inexpensive compact automatic camera system for wildlife research. Journal of Field Ornithology. 67(3). 414–421. 26 indexed citations
13.
DeGraaf, Richard M., et al.. (1991). Bird population and habitat surveys in urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning. 21(3). 181–188. 38 indexed citations
14.
Healy, William M., Robert T. Brooks, & Richard M. DeGraaf. (1989). Cavity Trees in Sawtimber-Size Oak Stands in Central Massachusetts. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 6(2). 61–65. 25 indexed citations
15.
DeGraaf, Richard M., et al.. (1987). Forest Type, Timber Size Class, and New England Breeding Birds. Journal of Wildlife Management. 51(1). 212–212. 18 indexed citations
16.
DeGraaf, Richard M.. (1987). BREEDING BIRDS AND GYPSY MOTH DEFOLIATION. 1 indexed citations
17.
Tubbs, Carl H., Richard M. DeGraaf, Mariko Yamasaki, & William M. Healy. (1987). Guide to wildlife tree management in New England northern hardwoods. 118. 1–30. 2 indexed citations
18.
Gross, Meir, et al.. (1981). Explorations in bird-land geometry. Urban Ecology. 5(2). 113–124. 13 indexed citations
19.
DeGraaf, Richard M., et al.. (1980). Management of Northcentral and Northeastern forests for nongame birds.. 80(8). 18 indexed citations
20.
DeGraaf, Richard M., et al.. (1974). Forest habitat management for non-game birds in central Appalachia. 192. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026