Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Richard M. Conrey
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard M. Conrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard M. Conrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard M. Conrey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard M. Conrey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard M. Conrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard M. Conrey. The network helps show where Richard M. Conrey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard M. Conrey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard M. Conrey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard M. Conrey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard M. Conrey. Richard M. Conrey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Conrey, Richard M., et al.. (2019). Combined Use of Multiple Internal and External Standards in LA-ICPMS Analysis of Geologic Samples Using Lithium Borate Fused Glass. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019.2 indexed citations
Irving, A. J., S. M. Kuehner, K. Ziegler, et al.. (2014). An Enigmatic Sodic Ferrogabbroic Achondrite from Morocco Containing Zirconolite, Baddeleyite, Fluorapatite and Copper Sulfides. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2418.1 indexed citations
Irving, A. J., et al.. (2013). Petrologic, Elemental and Oxygen Isotopic Characterization of Mg-Rich, Olivine-Phyric Quenched Angrite Northwest Africa 7812. M&PSA. 76. 5249.1 indexed citations
10.
Irving, A. J., S. M. Kuehner, T. E. Bunch, et al.. (2013). UNGROUPED MAFIC ACHONDRITE NORTHWEST AFRICA 7325: A REDUCED, IRON-POOR CUMULATE OLIVINE GABBRO FROM A DIFFERENTIATED PLANETARY PARENT BODY. A. J.. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2164.18 indexed citations
11.
Irving, A. J., S. M. Kuehner, K. Ziegler, et al.. (2013). Northwest Africa 7635: The First Depleted, Highly Ferroan and Phosphate-Free Evolved Olivine-Plagioclase-Phyric Shergottite. M&PSA. 76. 5274.3 indexed citations
Conrey, Richard M., William P. Leeman, Martin J. Streck, & Russell C. Evarts. (2003). The Boring Volcanic Field of the Portland Basin: Diverse Primitive Mafic Magmas Erupted in a Frontal Arc Setting. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2003.1 indexed citations
14.
Conrey, Richard M., et al.. (2002). North-central Oregon Cascades; exploring petrologic and tectonic intimacy in a propagating intra-arc rift. 36. 47–90.29 indexed citations
15.
Conrey, Richard M., et al.. (2001). The Shevlin Park Tuff, Central Oregon Cascade Range: Magmatic Processes Recorded in an Arc-Related Ash-Flow Tuff. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001.5 indexed citations
Conrey, Richard M., David R. Sherrod, P. R. Hooper, & Donald A. Swanson. (1997). Diverse primitive magmas in the Cascade Arc, northern Oregon and southern Washington. The Canadian Mineralogist. 35(2). 367–396.89 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.