Richard J. Fehring

3.2k total citations
102 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Richard J. Fehring is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard J. Fehring has authored 102 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 59 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 47 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 22 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Richard J. Fehring's work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (39 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (25 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (22 papers). Richard J. Fehring is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Contraception (39 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (25 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (22 papers). Richard J. Fehring collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Richard J. Fehring's co-authors include Mary Schneider, Kathleen M. Raviele, Christine Shaw, Joan Miller, Kristin Haglund, Mary Lee Barron, Thomas P. Bouchard, Patrícia Flatley Brennan, Lisa M. Edwards and Jessica Pruszynski and has published in prestigious journals such as Science Advances, Fertility and Sterility and Physical Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Richard J. Fehring

90 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard J. Fehring United States 22 903 678 544 394 358 102 2.3k
Birgitta Essén Sweden 42 1.3k 1.4× 109 0.2× 1.0k 1.9× 268 0.7× 1.8k 5.2× 176 5.7k
James D. Leeper United States 26 455 0.5× 98 0.1× 429 0.8× 186 0.5× 253 0.7× 101 2.2k
Colleen M. McBride United States 33 1.1k 1.2× 73 0.1× 805 1.5× 216 0.5× 502 1.4× 82 4.0k
Annemarie Jutel New Zealand 23 282 0.3× 49 0.1× 605 1.1× 114 0.3× 77 0.2× 69 2.0k
John Green United Kingdom 29 244 0.3× 98 0.1× 706 1.3× 625 1.6× 205 0.6× 88 3.3k
Heather B. Clayton United States 29 1.0k 1.1× 423 0.6× 502 0.9× 426 1.1× 653 1.8× 69 2.8k
Arik V. Marcell United States 35 1.8k 2.0× 387 0.6× 2.1k 3.9× 233 0.6× 1.0k 2.9× 117 4.9k
Karen Bonuck United States 31 800 0.9× 48 0.1× 541 1.0× 110 0.3× 339 0.9× 86 2.8k
James A. Farrow United States 11 194 0.2× 86 0.1× 334 0.6× 59 0.1× 120 0.3× 25 1.4k
Judith S. Palfrey United States 25 234 0.3× 93 0.1× 1.1k 2.0× 124 0.3× 628 1.8× 100 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard J. Fehring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard J. Fehring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard J. Fehring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard J. Fehring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard J. Fehring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard J. Fehring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard J. Fehring. The network helps show where Richard J. Fehring may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard J. Fehring

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard J. Fehring. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard J. Fehring based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard J. Fehring. Richard J. Fehring is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Écochard, René, et al.. (2024). Evidence that the woman’s ovarian cycle is driven by an internal circamonthly timing system. Science Advances. 10(15). eadg9646–eadg9646. 3 indexed citations
2.
Fehring, Richard J., et al.. (2023). A Comparison of Two Hormonal Fertility Monitoring Systems for Ovulation Detection: A Pilot Study. Medicina. 59(2). 400–400. 7 indexed citations
3.
Bouchard, Thomas P., et al.. (2022). Menstrual Cycle Parameters Are Not Significantly Different After COVID-19 Vaccination. Journal of Women s Health. 31(8). 1097–1102. 15 indexed citations
4.
Fehring, Richard J.. (2018). Contraception and Natural Family Planning: the Impact on the Sexual Lives of Couples?. e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University). 34(1). 101–126. 1 indexed citations
5.
Fehring, Richard J. & Mary Schneider. (2016). Effectiveness of a Natural Family Planning Service Program. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 42(1). 43–49. 9 indexed citations
6.
Nassaralla, Claudia L., Joseph B. Stanford, Katherine Daly, et al.. (2011). Characteristics of the Menstrual Cycle After Discontinuation of Oral Contraceptives. Journal of Women s Health. 20(2). 169–177. 35 indexed citations
7.
Fehring, Richard J., Mary Schneider, Mary Lee Barron, & Kathleen M. Raviele. (2009). Cohort comparison of two fertility awareness methods of family planning.. PubMed. 54(3). 165–70. 17 indexed citations
8.
Fehring, Richard J., et al.. (2007). The Influence of Religiosity on Contraceptive Use among Roman Catholic Women in the United States. The Linacre Quarterly. 74(2). 135–144. 11 indexed citations
9.
Fehring, Richard J.. (2006). The Present State of NFP Science, the Challenges we Face. e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University). 31(2).
10.
Barron, Mary Lee & Richard J. Fehring. (2005). Basal Body Temperature Assessment. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 30(5). 290–296. 58 indexed citations
11.
Fehring, Richard J.. (2003). An Analysis of the Majority Report “Responsible Parenthood” and its Recommendations on Abortion, Sterilization and Contraception. e-publications - Marquette (Marquette University). 156(1). 87–99. 1 indexed citations
12.
VandeVusse, Leona, et al.. (2003). Couples' Views of the Effects of Natural Family Planning on Marital Dynamics. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 35(2). 171–176. 22 indexed citations
13.
Fehring, Richard J.. (2002). Accuracy of the peak day of cervical mucus as a biological marker of fertility. Contraception. 66(4). 231–235. 60 indexed citations
14.
Fehring, Richard J. & William Kurz. (2000). Anthropological Differences Between Natural Family Planning and Contraception. 10(2202). 640–1. 1 indexed citations
15.
Fehring, Richard J., et al.. (1998). Religiosity, sexual activity, and attitudes of sexual permissiveness among older adolescents. Journal of Religion and Health. 37(3). 2 indexed citations
16.
Fehring, Richard J., et al.. (1994). Use Effectiveness of the Creighton Model Ovulation Method of Natural Family Planning. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 23(4). 303–309. 27 indexed citations
17.
Fehring, Richard J., et al.. (1991). Multinational Validation of Anxiety, Hopelessness, and Ineffective Airway Clearance. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2(2). 57–65. 34 indexed citations
18.
Fehring, Richard J. & Marilyn Frenn. (1987). Holistic Nursing Care: A Church and University Join Forces. Journal of Christian Nursing. 4. 1 indexed citations
19.
Riesch, Susan K., et al.. (1987). Expanding the Concept of Continuing Education Conferences: The Conference Participants as a Delphi Method Sample. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 18(2). 54–58. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hobson, Stacy, Amita Sharma, Te-Hsiung Sun, et al.. (1986). Empowering the village through video.. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026