Richard Harman

1.1k total citations
11 papers, 388 citations indexed

About

Richard Harman is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Harman has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 388 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 5 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Richard Harman's work include Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (2 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers). Richard Harman is often cited by papers focused on Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (2 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers). Richard Harman collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Sri Lanka. Richard Harman's co-authors include John F. Thompson, Graham Stevens, Karin Petersen-Schaefer, Michal J. Besser, Marjorie H. Colman, G. W. Milton, Dominic H. Moon, Andrew C. Zacest, W. H. McCarthy and Kerwin F. Shannon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer and ANZ Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Richard Harman

11 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Richard Harman

PRM

ONCOL

MB

GENET

SURGE

Drew Baldwin United States

Kathleen Madden United States

S. Korfee Germany

Ping Ai China

Neelam Shah United States

Sarah Caulfield United States

Ronan Tanguy France

I. Toledano France

Abhijeet Kumar United States

Atsushi Nagase Japan

Drew Baldwin United States

Richard Harman

151 ×0.5

PRM

96 ×0.4

ONCOL

77 ×0.4

MB

53 ×0.6

GENET

56 ×1.6

SURGE

Citations per year, relative to Richard Harman Richard Harman (= 1×) peers Drew Baldwin

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Harman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Harman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Harman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Harman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Harman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Harman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Harman. The network helps show where Richard Harman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Harman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Harman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Harman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Harman. Richard Harman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Lord, Simon, Richard Harman, Jane Holmes, et al.. (2023). CHARIOT: a phase I study of berzosertib with chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal and other solid cancers using time to event continual reassessment method. British Journal of Cancer. 130(3). 467–475. 13 indexed citations

2.

Werf, Bert van der, et al.. (2021). Morbidity following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: Results from key performance indicator assessment at a high‐volume centre in New Zealand. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 91(9). 1804–1812. 3 indexed citations

3.

Macdonald, A, et al.. (2020). Bedside ultrasonography for acute gallstone disease: a diagnostic accuracy study of surgical registrars and emergency medicine physicians. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 90(12). 2467–2471. 8 indexed citations

4.

Harman, Richard, et al.. (2020). Quality measures in cervical lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy by head and neck trained general surgeons.. PubMed. 133(1520). 50–60. 1 indexed citations

5.

Seneviratne, Sanjeewa, et al.. (2015). Patterns of axillary lymph node metastases and recurrent disease in grade 1 breast cancer in a New Zealand cohort: Does ethnicity matter?. Cancer Epidemiology. 39(6). 994–999. 1 indexed citations

6.

Harman, Richard, et al.. (2015). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma: a case series.. PubMed. 128(1423). 35–41. 1 indexed citations

7.

Harman, Richard, et al.. (2010). Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic adrenalectomy for treatment of Conn's syndrome (primary hyperaldosteronism) between 1999 and 2006.. PubMed. 123(1324). 50–6. 6 indexed citations

8.

Harman, Richard, et al.. (2009). Laparoscopic splenectomy and the treatment outcomes for idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura at North Shore Hospital.. PubMed. 122(1297). 38–48. 2 indexed citations

9.

Fife, Kate, Marjorie H. Colman, Graham Stevens, et al.. (2004). Determinants of Outcome in Melanoma Patients With Cerebral Metastases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 22(7). 1293–1300. 327 indexed citations

10.

Muthu, Carl, John McCall, John A. Windsor, et al.. (2003). The Auckland experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.. PubMed. 116(1178). U516–U516. 4 indexed citations

11.

Shaw, H. M., et al.. (1999). PRIMARY MUCOSAL AND GLANS PENIS MELANOMAS: THE SYDNEY MELANOMA UNIT EXPERIENCE. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 69(2). 121–126. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact