Richard Grant

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 775 citations indexed

About

Richard Grant is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Grant has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 775 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Richard Grant's work include Hip and Femur Fractures (5 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (5 papers). Richard Grant is often cited by papers focused on Hip and Femur Fractures (5 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (5 papers) and Foot and Ankle Surgery (5 papers). Richard Grant collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Richard Grant's co-authors include Justin Stoler, M. P. Lawton, Miriam S. Moss, Morton H. Kleban, Thomas Ten Have, Christine Hoffman, Matthew L. Costa, Sophie Staniszewska, David J. Keene and Carole Mockford and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, BMJ and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Richard Grant

34 papers receiving 760 citations

Hit Papers

Converting an odds ratio to a range of plausible relative... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Grant United Kingdom 10 125 112 94 87 80 38 775
Zahidul Quayyum United Kingdom 19 248 2.0× 129 1.2× 186 2.0× 272 3.1× 63 0.8× 40 1.4k
Sarah Rhodes United Kingdom 17 106 0.8× 166 1.5× 66 0.7× 56 0.6× 30 0.4× 74 843
Ewan Wilkinson United Kingdom 21 143 1.1× 70 0.6× 189 2.0× 201 2.3× 17 0.2× 53 1.3k
Demetris Lamnisos Cyprus 18 145 1.2× 85 0.8× 183 1.9× 140 1.6× 11 0.1× 75 1.1k
Dielle J. Lundberg United States 17 130 1.0× 42 0.4× 130 1.4× 57 0.7× 15 0.2× 19 680
Krishna Gopal Rampal Malaysia 22 358 2.9× 46 0.4× 184 2.0× 130 1.5× 11 0.1× 46 1.3k
Mohammad Moradi-Joo Iran 13 94 0.8× 79 0.7× 159 1.7× 60 0.7× 12 0.1× 36 721
Thomas Fleming United States 6 190 1.5× 118 1.1× 313 3.3× 170 2.0× 8 0.1× 9 1.4k
Tim Gomersall United Kingdom 16 180 1.4× 98 0.9× 88 0.9× 55 0.6× 4 0.1× 25 892

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Grant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Grant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Grant. The network helps show where Richard Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Grant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Grant. Richard Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grant, Richard, et al.. (2025). Toward a Circular Economy for a Sociotechnical Transition in Ghana’s e-waste Sector. The Journal of Environment & Development. 34(4). 1021–1048. 2 indexed citations
3.
Keene, David J., Juul Achten, May Ee Png, et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of supervised versus self-directed rehabilitation for adults aged 50 years and over with ankle fractures: protocol for the AFTER trial. Bone & Joint Open. 5(6). 499–513. 2 indexed citations
4.
Tutton, Elizabeth, Stephen Gwilym, Alexander Joeris, et al.. (2023). Understanding patient experience of distal tibia or ankle fracture: a qualitative systematic review. Bone & Joint Open. 4(3). 188–197. 4 indexed citations
5.
Tutton, Elizabeth, Alexander Joeris, Stephen Gwilym, et al.. (2022). A systematic review of outcome reporting in clinical trials of distal tibia and ankle fractures. Bone & Joint Open. 3(10). 832–840. 1 indexed citations
7.
Tutton, Elizabeth, et al.. (2021). Patient and informal carer experience of hip fracture: a qualitative study using interviews and observation in acute orthopaedic trauma. BMJ Open. 11(2). e042040–e042040. 7 indexed citations
8.
Tutton, Elizabeth, Alexander Joeris, Stephen Gwilym, et al.. (2021). Co-producing a multi-stakeholder Core Outcome Set for distal Tibia and Ankle fractures (COSTA): a study protocol. Trials. 22(1). 443–443. 5 indexed citations
9.
Staniszewska, Sophie, Edward M. Hill, Richard Grant, et al.. (2021). Developing a Framework for Public Involvement in Mathematical and Economic Modelling: Bringing New Dynamism to Vaccination Policy Recommendations. Patient. 14(4). 435–445. 19 indexed citations
10.
Costa, Matthew L., Juul Achten, Ruth Knight, et al.. (2020). Negative-pressure wound therapy compared with standard dressings following surgical treatment of major trauma to the lower limb: the WHiST RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 24(38). 1–86. 7 indexed citations
11.
Png, May Ee, Jason Madan, Melina Dritsaki, et al.. (2020). Cost-utility analysis of standard dressing compared with incisional negative-pressure wound therapy among patients with closed surgical wounds following major trauma to the lower limb. The Bone & Joint Journal. 102-B(8). 1072–1081. 9 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Mark A., Zoé Paskins, Matthew L. Costa, et al.. (2019). Research priorities for the management of broken bones of the upper limb in people over 50: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. BMJ Open. 9(12). e030028–e030028. 10 indexed citations
13.
Fernandez, Miguel A., Richard Grant, Philip Bell, et al.. (2018). Research priorities in fragility fractures of the lower limb and pelvis: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. BMJ Open. 8(10). e023301–e023301. 28 indexed citations
14.
Mockford, Carole, Kate Seers, Jan R. Oyebode, et al.. (2016). A SHARED study-the benefits and costs of setting up a health research study involving lay co-researchers and how we overcame the challenges. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2(1). 8–8. 33 indexed citations
15.
Grant, Richard. (2014). Converting an odds ratio to a range of plausible relative risks for better communication of research findings. BMJ. 348(jan24 1). f7450–f7450. 367 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Grant, Richard, Paul T. Vianco, & Jerome A. Rejent. (2003). Development of Sn-based, low melting temperature Pb-free solder alloys.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 45(3). 1 indexed citations
17.
Grant, Richard. (2002). Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Institutionalized Elders. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 3(3). 209–209. 1 indexed citations
18.
Lawton, M. P., Miriam S. Moss, Christine Hoffman, et al.. (1999). Health, Valuation of Life, and the Wish to Live. The Gerontologist. 39(4). 406–416. 89 indexed citations
19.
Grant, Richard. (1994). China and Its Asian Neighbors: Looking Toward the Twenty-First Century. The Washington Quarterly. 17(1). 59–69.
20.
Grant, Richard, et al.. (1993). Pressurized modules for Space Station Freedom. 13(3). 231–243. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026