Richard G. Obregon

1.7k total citations
8 papers, 289 citations indexed

About

Richard G. Obregon is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard G. Obregon has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 289 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Richard G. Obregon's work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers). Richard G. Obregon is often cited by papers focused on Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers). Richard G. Obregon collaborates with scholars based in United States and Finland. Richard G. Obregon's co-authors include Udo P. Schmiedl, Howard Simon, Patrick C. Freeny, S Schulte, Charles A. Rohrmann, John D. Newell, David A. Lynch, Charles H. Kirkpatrick, Terese I. Kaske and Joel R. Gober and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation Research, Radiology and CHEST Journal.

In The Last Decade

Richard G. Obregon

8 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard G. Obregon United States 8 155 129 109 60 40 8 289
Maria A. Velez United States 9 208 1.3× 108 0.8× 64 0.6× 115 1.9× 44 1.1× 26 362
Han Lin China 9 124 0.8× 53 0.4× 98 0.9× 68 1.1× 18 0.5× 16 286
Shuhei Yoshida Japan 10 160 1.0× 79 0.6× 76 0.7× 41 0.7× 24 0.6× 34 289
Desiree Weiberg Germany 11 178 1.1× 184 1.4× 53 0.5× 76 1.3× 74 1.9× 21 378
Benoît Paulmier Monaco 7 113 0.7× 155 1.2× 32 0.3× 19 0.3× 50 1.3× 12 244
Steven J. Mentzer United States 7 296 1.9× 38 0.3× 135 1.2× 93 1.6× 85 2.1× 7 486
Mark A. Meier Netherlands 8 43 0.3× 98 0.8× 69 0.6× 26 0.4× 74 1.9× 12 261
Wayne Kasecamp United States 8 70 0.5× 183 1.4× 27 0.2× 48 0.8× 15 0.4× 15 296
John A. Cutrone United States 7 152 1.0× 373 2.9× 24 0.2× 67 1.1× 16 0.4× 13 448
Makoto Endo Japan 9 235 1.5× 77 0.6× 118 1.1× 60 1.0× 58 1.4× 47 378

Countries citing papers authored by Richard G. Obregon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard G. Obregon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard G. Obregon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard G. Obregon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard G. Obregon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard G. Obregon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard G. Obregon. The network helps show where Richard G. Obregon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard G. Obregon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard G. Obregon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard G. Obregon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard G. Obregon. Richard G. Obregon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Hara, Amy K., Meridith Blevins, Mei‐Hsiu Chen, et al.. (2011). ACRIN CT Colonography Trial: Does Reader’s Preference for Primary Two-dimensional versus Primary Three-dimensional Interpretation Affect Performance?. Radiology. 259(2). 435–441. 11 indexed citations
2.
Hara, Amy K., Mark Kuo, Meridith Blevins, et al.. (2011). National CT Colonography Trial (ACRIN 6664): Comparison of Three Full-Laxative Bowel Preparations in More Than 2500 Average-Risk Patients. American Journal of Roentgenology. 196(5). 1076–1082. 20 indexed citations
3.
Glickerman, David J., Richard G. Obregon, Udo P. Schmiedl, et al.. (1996). Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: a prospective comparison with conventional angiography.. American Journal of Roentgenology. 167(2). 445–451. 43 indexed citations
4.
Schulte, Scott J., et al.. (1996). MR of focal liver lesions: Comparison of breath‐hold and non‐breath‐hold hybrid rare and conventional spin‐echo T2‐weighted pulse sequences. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 6(4). 596–602. 18 indexed citations
5.
Schulte, S, Richard G. Obregon, Howard Simon, et al.. (1995). Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique.. Radiology. 196(1). 227–232. 89 indexed citations
6.
Obregon, Richard G., David A. Lynch, Terese I. Kaske, John D. Newell, & Charles H. Kirkpatrick. (1994). Radiologic Findings of Adult Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders. CHEST Journal. 106(2). 490–495. 44 indexed citations
7.
Gober, Joel R., Saul Schaefer, Santiago Camacho, et al.. (1990). Epicardial and endocardia1 localized 31p magnetic resonance spectroscopy: evidence for metabolic heterogeneity during regional ischemia. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 13(2). 204–215. 19 indexed citations
8.
Schaefer, Saul, S. Albert Camacho, Joel R. Gober, et al.. (1989). Response of myocardial metabolites to graded regional ischemia: 31P NMR spectroscopy of porcine myocardium in vivo.. Circulation Research. 64(5). 968–976. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026