Richard Ellis

917 total citations
24 papers, 418 citations indexed

About

Richard Ellis is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Ellis has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 418 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 7 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Richard Ellis's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers). Richard Ellis is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers). Richard Ellis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Richard Ellis's co-authors include R. P. H. Thompson, Neville A Punchard, G. Astrid Limb, Jonathan J. Powell, John R. Goodlad, R. P. H. Thompson, David Reffitt, John Meenan, Jenny Powell and Kesavan Kandiah and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Gastroenterology and Gut.

In The Last Decade

Richard Ellis

22 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Richard Ellis United Kingdom	9	167	145	106	95	60	24	418
Jens Nederby Nielsen Denmark	11	108 0.6×	83 0.6×	208 2.0×	95 1.0×	50 0.8×	13	478
Patrick S. Gentile United States	13	47 0.3×	93 0.6×	123 1.2×	48 0.5×	49 0.8×	25	455
Yasunori Nishio Japan	10	249 1.5×	59 0.4×	110 1.0×	38 0.4×	16 0.3×	41	464
Ioannis D. Kostakis Greece	10	95 0.6×	107 0.7×	197 1.9×	62 0.7×	46 0.8×	14	530
P G Collins United Kingdom	14	213 1.3×	99 0.7×	87 0.8×	65 0.7×	31 0.5×	34	582
B Steiner Austria	9	105 0.6×	46 0.3×	80 0.8×	77 0.8×	121 2.0×	17	375
Terumasa Hisano Japan	11	207 1.2×	34 0.2×	153 1.4×	21 0.2×	61 1.0×	30	431
S Liebe Germany	11	348 2.1×	40 0.3×	247 2.3×	74 0.8×	75 1.3×	27	533
Caiwang Yan China	13	188 1.1×	125 0.9×	85 0.8×	47 0.5×	58 1.0×	35	597
Tomomitsu Okamoto Japan	16	74 0.4×	38 0.3×	74 0.7×	28 0.3×	75 1.3×	36	564

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Ellis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Ellis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Ellis. The network helps show where Richard Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Ellis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Ellis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Ellis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Ellis. Richard Ellis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Thayalasekaran, Sreedhari, Rupam Bhattacharyya, Fergus Chedgy, et al.. (2022). Randomized controlled trial of EndoRings assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy. Digestive Endoscopy. 35(3). 354–360. 6 indexed citations

Bhattacharyya, Rupam, Fergus Chedgy, Kesavan Kandiah, et al.. (2017). Endocuff-assisted vs. standard colonoscopy in the fecal occult blood test-based UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (E-cap study): a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 49(11). 1043–1050. 43 indexed citations

Bhattacharyya, Rupam, Fergus Chedgy, Kesavan Kandiah, et al.. (2016). PTH-039 The First Randomised Controlled Trial of Endocuff Vision® Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection in Bowel Cancer Screening Patients (E-Cap Study): Abstract PTH-039 Table 1. Gut. 65(Suppl 1). A237.1–A237. 1 indexed citations

Bhattacharyya, Rupam, Fergus Chedgy, Kesavan Kandiah, et al.. (2016). Tu2087 The First Randomised Controlled Trial of Endocuff Vision® Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection in Bowel Cancer Screening Patients (E-CAP study). Gastroenterology. 150(4). S1270–S1270. 4 indexed citations

Longcroft‐Wheaton, Gaius, et al.. (2014). A novel technique for peroral direct cholangioscopy. Endoscopy. 46(S 01). E672–E673. 1 indexed citations

Neale, James, Richard Ellis, Patrick Goggin, & Andrew Fowell. (2013). PWE-035 The Introduction of a Weekly General Anaesthetic Ercp List Improves Desired Duct Cannulation and Duct Drainage Rates. Gut. 62(Suppl 1). A144.2–A145.

Raghavan, Rajeev, et al.. (2012). The use of plasmapheresis in managing primary biliary cirrhosis presenting with profound hypercholesterolaemia. The British Journal of Diabetes. 12(3). 156–158. 2 indexed citations

Widdrington, John, Carlos Echevarria, M F Bone, & Richard Ellis. (2010). Hydatid cysts of the lung: Figure 1. BMJ Case Reports. 2010. bcr0420102938–bcr0420102938. 5 indexed citations

Hookey, Lawrence, et al.. (2009). A reliable and safe gastrotomy closure technique assessed in a porcine survival model pilot study: success of the Queen’s closure. Endoscopy. 41(6). 493–497. 10 indexed citations

10.

Fowell, Andrew, David Poller, & Richard Ellis. (2006). Diffuse luminal ulceration resulting from duodenal plasmacytoma. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 65(4). 707–708. 8 indexed citations

11.

Lomer, Miranda, S L Grainger, Roland Ede, et al.. (2005). Lack of efficacy of a reduced microparticle diet in a multi-centred trial of patients with active Crohn??s disease. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 17(3). 377–384. 77 indexed citations

12.

Ellis, Richard, Paul Ashwood, Jonathan Powell, et al.. (2002). Selective Binding of Nucleotide Probes by Eosinophilic Cationic Protein During in situ Hybridisation. The Histochemical Journal. 34(3-4). 153–160. 1 indexed citations

13.

Ellis, Richard, et al.. (2000). Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Gut. 47(5). 728–731. 59 indexed citations

14.

Reffitt, David, et al.. (1998). Ferric trimaltol corrects iron deficiency anaemia in patients intolerant of iron. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 12(9). 845–848. 65 indexed citations

15.

Ellis, Richard, John R. Goodlad, G. Astrid Limb, et al.. (1998). Activation of nuclear factor kappa B in Crohn's disease. Inflammation Research. 47(11). 440–445. 69 indexed citations

16.

Ellis, Richard, G. Astrid Limb, R. P. H. Thompson, & Neville A Punchard. (1997). NFκB in Crohn's disease. Biochemical Society Transactions. 25(2). 178S–178S. 37 indexed citations

17.

Ellis, Richard, Charles H. Smith, John R. Goodlad, Neil Smith, & R. P. H. Thompson. (1996). Mesenteric vasculitis associated with Sézary syndrome.. Gut. 39(2). 334–335. 4 indexed citations

18.

Ellis, Richard. (1977). Incomplete Border Sign of Extrapleural Masses. JAMA. 237(25). 2748–2748. 9 indexed citations

19.

Ellis, Richard. (1976). Traumatic Lung Cysts. JAMA. 236(17). 1976–1976. 7 indexed citations

20.

Ellis, Richard. (1971). The Complete Border Sign Of Breast Augmentation. JAMA. 216(3). 522–522.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact