Richard E. Mock

753 citations
17 papers · 586 indexed · h-index 11

Richard E. Mock

17 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Richard E. Mock
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Infectious Diseases 300
  • Animal Science and Zoology 142
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 104
  • Immunology 133
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 140
Replace Zdeněk Pospı́šil with:
Zdeněk Pospı́šil Czechia
F. Ramiro-Ibáñez United States
J. E. O'GRADY United Kingdom
A. J. Beale United Kingdom
Pauline Wertheim‐van Dillen Netherlands
Jon D. Gabbard United States
T. Nikkilä Sweden
Jianmin Wu China
Fabien Miszczak France
M. Toman Czechia
Richard E. Mock relative to Zdeněk Pospı́šil Czechia Zdeněk Pospı́šil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Zdeněk Pospı́šil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Mock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Mock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Mock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Mock. The network helps show where Richard E. Mock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Mock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Mock Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Mock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201253
2 201134
3 201022
4 2006166
5
Microbial pathogen survival study in a high plains feedyard playa.
20017
6 200022
7 199524
8 199369
9 199131
10 19911
11 199043
12 19827
13 198214
14 198210
15 19808
16 19794
17 197671

About Richard E. Mock

Richard E. Mock is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Infectious Diseases and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (5 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (5 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (4 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (4 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers) and Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (300 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (142 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (104 citations), Immunology (133 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (140 citations). Richard E. Mock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Melanie A. Samuel, Margaret W. King, Peter W. Mason, Brian C. Keller, Brenda L. Fredericksen, Michael Diamond, James G. Lecce, Michael Gale, Robert W. Fulton and Jean M. d’Offay. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Infection and Immunity and Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026