Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Richard Daniel Klein Richard Daniel Klein (= 1×)
peers
Javed Akhter
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Daniel Klein
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Daniel Klein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Daniel Klein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Daniel Klein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Daniel Klein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Daniel Klein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Daniel Klein. The network helps show where Richard Daniel Klein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Daniel Klein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Daniel Klein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Daniel Klein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Daniel Klein. Richard Daniel Klein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Klein, Richard Daniel. (2014). Civil Rights in Crisis: The Racial Impact of the Denial of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel. SSRN Electronic Journal. 14(2). 163.3 indexed citations
2.
Klein, Richard Daniel. (2008). An Analysis of Thirty-Five Years of Rape Reform: A Frustrating Search for Fundamental Fairness. Akron law review. 41(4). 7.3 indexed citations
3.
Klein, Richard Daniel. (2006). Judicial Misconduct in Criminal Cases: It's Not Just the Counsel Who May Be Ineffective and Unprofessional. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).2 indexed citations
4.
Klein, Richard Daniel. (2004). Due Process Denied: Judicial Coercion in the Plea Bargaining Process. Hofstra law review. 32(4). 14.1 indexed citations
Klein, Richard Daniel. (2001). Cultural Relativism, Economic Development and International Human Rights in the Asian Context. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Klein, Richard Daniel. (1999). The Constitutionalization of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
13.
Su, Grace L., Amir Rahemtulla, Peter Thomas, et al.. (1998). CD14 and lipopolysaccharide binding protein expression in a rat model of alcoholic liver disease.. PubMed. 152(3). 841–9.73 indexed citations
Klein, Richard Daniel. (1997). The Empire Strikes Back: Britain's Use of the Law to Suppress Political Dissent in Hong Kong. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
17.
Klein, Richard Daniel. (1995). Law and Racism in an Asian Setting: An Analysis of the British Rule of Hong Kong. SSRN Electronic Journal. 18(2). 223.
Klein, Richard Daniel. (1993). The Eleventh Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Be Compelled to Render the Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Indiana law journal. 68(2). 2.1 indexed citations
20.
Klein, Richard Daniel. (1986). The Emperor Gideon Has No Clothes: The Empty Promise of the Constitutional Right of Effective Assistance of Counsel. Hastings constitutional law quarterly. 13(4). 625.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.