Ricardo J. Motta

716 total citations
11 papers, 487 citations indexed

About

Ricardo J. Motta is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ricardo J. Motta has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 487 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 2 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ricardo J. Motta's work include Color Science and Applications (9 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (2 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper). Ricardo J. Motta is often cited by papers focused on Color Science and Applications (9 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (2 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper). Ricardo J. Motta collaborates with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Ricardo J. Motta's co-authors include Roy S. Berns, Michael Stokes, Srinivasan Chandrasekar, Matthew Anderson, Joyce Farrell and Francisco H. Imai and has published in prestigious journals such as Color Research & Application, Revista de Administração de Empresas and Color and Imaging Conference.

In The Last Decade

Ricardo J. Motta

10 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ricardo J. Motta United States 6 305 278 105 70 60 11 487
Francisco H. Imai United States 16 456 1.5× 304 1.1× 119 1.1× 129 1.8× 41 0.7× 52 881
Steven D. Hordley United Kingdom 9 413 1.4× 517 1.9× 93 0.9× 128 1.8× 73 1.2× 17 630
Michael Stokes United States 4 195 0.6× 272 1.0× 61 0.6× 68 1.0× 50 0.8× 9 441
Henry R. Kang United States 7 322 1.1× 299 1.1× 52 0.5× 59 0.8× 25 0.4× 13 484
Mitchell R. Rosen United States 13 381 1.2× 290 1.0× 126 1.2× 100 1.4× 54 0.9× 46 513
Lawrence A. Taplin United States 11 332 1.1× 193 0.7× 102 1.0× 62 0.9× 61 1.0× 37 445
Ján Morovič United Kingdom 12 392 1.3× 352 1.3× 131 1.2× 65 0.9× 78 1.3× 68 526
Eva M. Valero Spain 13 317 1.0× 210 0.8× 49 0.5× 156 2.2× 107 1.8× 78 582
Peter Morovič United Kingdom 10 226 0.7× 174 0.6× 53 0.5× 56 0.8× 48 0.8× 40 272
Peter G. Engeldrum United States 9 170 0.6× 222 0.8× 92 0.9× 68 1.0× 79 1.3× 17 360

Countries citing papers authored by Ricardo J. Motta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ricardo J. Motta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ricardo J. Motta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ricardo J. Motta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ricardo J. Motta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ricardo J. Motta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ricardo J. Motta. The network helps show where Ricardo J. Motta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ricardo J. Motta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ricardo J. Motta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ricardo J. Motta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ricardo J. Motta. Ricardo J. Motta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Motta, Ricardo J.. (2009). The future of photography. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7537. 753702–753702.
2.
Imai, Francisco H., et al.. (2005). Design of a Framework for HDR Sequence Rendering Evaluation. Color and Imaging Conference. 13(1). 14–19. 1 indexed citations
3.
Anderson, Matthew, Ricardo J. Motta, Srinivasan Chandrasekar, & Michael Stokes. (1996). Proposal for a Standard Default Color Space for the Internet - sRGB.. 12(1). 238–245. 115 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, Matthew, Ricardo J. Motta, Srinivasan Chandrasekar, & Michael Stokes. (1996). Proposal for a Standard Default Color Space for the Internet—sRGB. Color and Imaging Conference. 4(1). 238–245. 123 indexed citations
5.
Motta, Ricardo J.. (1995). A busca da competitividade nas empresas. Revista de Administração de Empresas. 35(2). 12–16. 8 indexed citations
6.
Motta, Ricardo J.. (1995). <title>Computer color reproduction</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2414. 2–9. 1 indexed citations
7.
Berns, Roy S., et al.. (1993). CRT colorimetry. part I: Theory and practice. Color Research & Application. 18(5). 299–314. 162 indexed citations
8.
Motta, Ricardo J.. (1993). <title>Visual characterization of color CRTs</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1909. 212–221. 9 indexed citations
9.
Berns, Roy S., et al.. (1993). CRT colorimetry. Part II: Metrology. Color Research & Application. 18(5). 315–325. 62 indexed citations
10.
Motta, Ricardo J. & Joyce Farrell. (1993). A Simplified Method for the Colorimetric Characterization of Fluorescent Inks. Color and Imaging Conference. 1(1). 83–84. 1 indexed citations
11.
Motta, Ricardo J.. (1991). An Analytical model for the colorimetric characterization of color CRTs. RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026