RF Lamont
- Microbiology top 1%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis 6
- Urinary Tract Infections Management 3
- Dermatology top 10%
-
- Pregnancy-related medical research 3
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 4
-
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research 4
-
- Surgical site infection prevention 4
-
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 3
-
- Infant Development and Preterm Care 2
- Co-authors
- J. D. SobelRoberto RomeroJuan Pedro KusanovicTinnakorn ChaiworapongsaD Taylor‐RobinsonPhilip G. SmithNiels UldbjergSK Kim
- Journals
- BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (13 papers)Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (1 paper)International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
RF Lamont
16 papers receiving 929 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Microbiology 343
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 118
- Epidemiology 420
- Dermatology 66
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 215
Countries citing papers authored by RF Lamont
This map shows the geographic impact of RF Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RF Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RF Lamont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by RF Lamont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by RF Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RF Lamont. The network helps show where RF Lamont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside RF Lamont, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 77 | |
| 6 | The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniquesbreakdown → | 2011 | 356 |
| 7 | 2010 | 114 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 75 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 81 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 99 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 3 |
About RF Lamont
RF Lamont is a scholar working on Microbiology, Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (4 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (343 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (118 citations) and Epidemiology (420 citations). RF Lamont has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Sobel, Roberto Romero, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, D Taylor‐Robinson, Philip G. Smith, Niels Uldbjerg, SK Kim, Edi Vaisbuch and Shali Mazaki‐Tovi. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.