RF Lamont

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 960 citations indexed

About

RF Lamont is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, RF Lamont has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 960 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Epidemiology, 5 papers in Surgery and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in RF Lamont's work include Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers). RF Lamont is often cited by papers focused on Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers). RF Lamont collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. RF Lamont's co-authors include Roberto Romero, J. D. Sobel, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, D Taylor‐Robinson, Philip G. Smith, Niels Uldbjerg, Edi Vaisbuch, SK Kim and Shali Mazaki‐Tovi and has published in prestigious journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics and Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.

In The Last Decade

RF Lamont

16 papers receiving 929 citations

Hit Papers

The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tra... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
RF Lamont United Kingdom 10 420 343 215 204 139 17 960
Gilles R.G. Monif United States 20 692 1.6× 351 1.0× 217 1.0× 174 0.9× 110 0.8× 109 1.3k
P Hay United Kingdom 12 549 1.3× 642 1.9× 204 0.9× 96 0.5× 60 0.4× 22 1.2k
Birger R. Møller Denmark 16 318 0.8× 424 1.2× 133 0.6× 113 0.6× 44 0.3× 38 792
Ljubomir Petričević Austria 20 868 2.1× 950 2.8× 265 1.2× 97 0.5× 334 2.4× 42 1.5k
Maria Agnese Latino Italy 12 315 0.8× 319 0.9× 194 0.9× 92 0.5× 100 0.7× 25 774
R. Phillips Heine United States 18 522 1.2× 369 1.1× 319 1.5× 55 0.3× 44 0.3× 42 998
Janet Wilson United Kingdom 18 567 1.4× 931 2.7× 205 1.0× 244 1.2× 111 0.8× 66 1.4k
W. David Hager United States 16 760 1.8× 342 1.0× 244 1.1× 204 1.0× 101 0.7× 40 1.4k
C A Ison United Kingdom 18 716 1.7× 1.1k 3.2× 232 1.1× 85 0.4× 113 0.8× 34 1.3k
Hunter A. Hammill United States 16 685 1.6× 391 1.1× 182 0.8× 170 0.8× 25 0.2× 43 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by RF Lamont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of RF Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RF Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RF Lamont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by RF Lamont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by RF Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RF Lamont. The network helps show where RF Lamont may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of RF Lamont

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of RF Lamont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of RF Lamont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with RF Lamont. RF Lamont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Hyldig, Nana, et al.. (2021). Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women undergoing caesarean section: a commentary on new evidence that fuels the debate. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 128(13). 2127–2130. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hyldig, Nana, Christina Anne Vinter, Marie Kruse, et al.. (2018). Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 126(5). 628–635. 68 indexed citations
3.
Schrøder, Katja, RF Lamont, Jan Stener Jørgensen, & Niels Christian Hvidt. (2018). Second victims need emotional support after adverse events: even in a just safety culture. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 126(4). 440–442. 12 indexed citations
4.
Hyldig, Nana, Camilla Bille, Christina Anne Vinter, et al.. (2018). Cost‐effectiveness of incisional negative pressure wound therapy compared with standard care after caesarean section in obese women: a trial‐based economic evaluation. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 126(5). 619–627. 34 indexed citations
5.
Broe, Anne, Anton Pottegård, RF Lamont, Jan Stener Jørgensen, & Per Damkier. (2014). Increasing use of antibiotics in pregnancy during the period 2000–2010: prevalence, timing, category, and demographics. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 121(8). 988–996. 77 indexed citations
6.
Lamont, RF, et al.. (2011). The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 118(5). 533–549. 356 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Taylor‐Robinson, D & RF Lamont. (2010). Mycoplasmas in pregnancy. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 118(2). 164–174. 75 indexed citations
8.
Lamont, RF, J. D. Sobel, Edi Vaisbuch, et al.. (2010). Parvovirus B19 infection in human pregnancy. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 118(2). 175–186. 114 indexed citations
9.
Lamont, RF, J. D. Sobel, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, et al.. (2010). Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 118(2). 193–201. 81 indexed citations
10.
Lamont, RF, et al.. (2009). The use of progesterone and other progestational agents to prevent spontaneous preterm labour and preterm birth. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 10(6). 1007–1016. 9 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Philip G., et al.. (2007). Use of C‐reactive protein as a predictor of chorioamnionitis in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: a systematic review. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 114(7). 796–801. 99 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Philip G., et al.. (2007). Authors response to: Use of C‐reactive protein as a predictor of chorioamnionitis in preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: a systematic review. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 115(1). 128–128.
13.
Lamont, RF. (2006). Setting up a preterm prevention clinic: a practical guide. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 113(s3). 86–92. 19 indexed citations
14.
Lamont, RF. (2006). A quality assessment tool to evaluate tocolytic studies. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 113(s3). 96–99. 6 indexed citations
16.
Lamont, RF. (1997). The diagnosis and obstetrical implications of bacterial vaginosis. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review. 9(4). 199–207. 1 indexed citations
17.
Lamont, RF, et al.. (1987). Spontaneous early preterm labour associated with abnormal genital bacterial colonization. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 25(6). 492–492. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026