Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An analysis of farmers’ intention to use green pesticides: The application of the extended theory of planned behavior and health belief model
This map shows the geographic impact of Reza Movahedi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reza Movahedi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reza Movahedi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reza Movahedi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reza Movahedi. The network helps show where Reza Movahedi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reza Movahedi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reza Movahedi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reza Movahedi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Reza Movahedi. Reza Movahedi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2015). The Study of Students' Attitudes towards the Use of Internet in Education (Case Study: Kermanshah Azad University). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2014). The Agricultural Students' Satisfaction from Their Field of Study (Case Study: Bu-Ali Sina University, College of Agriculture). 4(1). 43–49.1 indexed citations
11.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2013). Entrepreneurial Personality Traits of Agricultural Students. 3(1). 7–12.1 indexed citations
12.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2013). Identifying entrepreneurship abilities in agricultural extension and education specialized credits. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS). 5(23). 2845–2851.3 indexed citations
13.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2013). The Factors Affecting Agricultural Students' Attitude towards Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences (IJACS). 5(16). 1813–1819.18 indexed citations
14.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2012). Factors affecting teaching quality and research performance of faculty members: the case of the Agricultural Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University.. 7(2). 63–75.
15.
Movahedi, Reza & U. Nagel. (2012). IDENTIFYING REQUIRED COMPETENCIES FOR THE AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AND EDUCATION UNDERGRADUATES. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 14(4). 727–742.16 indexed citations
16.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2012). Analysis of sustainable water resource management in agriculture: case of Kurdistan, Iran.. 2(2). 53–58.1 indexed citations
17.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2011). Assessing agricultural students' attitude towards entrepreneurship.. 1(4). 168–173.11 indexed citations
18.
Movahedi, Reza, et al.. (2011). Analyzing Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of Rural ICT Development in Iran's Villages. 1(1). 17–26.1 indexed citations
Hayati, Dariush, et al.. (2009). An empirical model of factors affecting farmers' participation in natural resources conservational programs in Iran. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment. 7(1). 201–207.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.