Rena D. Malik

1.1k total citations
72 papers, 669 citations indexed

About

Rena D. Malik is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Urology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Rena D. Malik has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 669 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Rheumatology, 22 papers in Urology and 15 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Rena D. Malik's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (21 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (16 papers) and Urinary Tract Infections Management (11 papers). Rena D. Malik is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (21 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (16 papers) and Urinary Tract Infections Management (11 papers). Rena D. Malik collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Israel. Rena D. Malik's co-authors include Philippe E. Zimmern, Dennis B. Liu, Alana Christie, Joseph J. Pariser, Brittany Lapin, Brian T. Helfand, Mohan S. Gundeti, Joshua A. Cohn, Chihsiung E. Wang and Gregory T. Bales and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Urology and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

Rena D. Malik

69 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rena D. Malik United States 15 251 212 176 159 111 72 669
Nnenaya A. Mmonu United States 13 117 0.5× 148 0.7× 152 0.9× 60 0.4× 101 0.9× 45 465
Alexander Small United States 17 49 0.2× 112 0.5× 209 1.2× 79 0.5× 459 4.1× 74 865
Gina M. Badalato United States 18 50 0.2× 135 0.6× 481 2.7× 51 0.3× 290 2.6× 86 928
Richard J. Boxer United States 11 83 0.3× 186 0.9× 231 1.3× 61 0.4× 297 2.7× 27 748
Dara Lundon United States 15 73 0.3× 52 0.2× 130 0.7× 54 0.3× 259 2.3× 65 656
Richard A. Schoor United States 13 67 0.3× 109 0.5× 297 1.7× 24 0.2× 92 0.8× 24 772
Jennifer M. Taylor United States 16 29 0.1× 207 1.0× 616 3.5× 102 0.6× 168 1.5× 55 982
Mariavittoria Locci Italy 14 71 0.3× 26 0.1× 73 0.4× 76 0.5× 50 0.5× 58 911
J V Jolleys United Kingdom 10 449 1.8× 264 1.2× 179 1.0× 226 1.4× 53 0.5× 13 708
Shu‐Fen Liao Taiwan 12 190 0.8× 95 0.4× 193 1.1× 174 1.1× 53 0.5× 28 510

Countries citing papers authored by Rena D. Malik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rena D. Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rena D. Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rena D. Malik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rena D. Malik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rena D. Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rena D. Malik. The network helps show where Rena D. Malik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rena D. Malik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rena D. Malik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rena D. Malik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rena D. Malik. Rena D. Malik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rodler, Severin, Serena Maruccia, Andre Luis Abreu, et al.. (2024). Readability Assessment of Patient Education Materials on Uro-oncological Diseases Using Automated Measures. European Urology Focus. 10(6). 1055–1061. 7 indexed citations
2.
Loeb, Stacy, et al.. (2023). Harm Related to Social Media Misinformation on Pelvic Organ Prolapse in YouTube, Instagram, and Pinterest Posts. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 131–135.
3.
Hassan, Naeemul, et al.. (2023). “O” no: a Reddit analysis of orgasmic dysfunction. Sexual Medicine. 11(6). qfad061–qfad061. 3 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Shu & Rena D. Malik. (2023). Social Media and Apps in Urology. Current Surgery Reports. 12(7). 205–212. 4 indexed citations
5.
Dmochowski, Roger R., Diane K. Newman, Eric S. Rovner, et al.. (2023). Patient and Clinician Challenges with Anticholinergic Step Therapy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder: A Narrative Review. Advances in Therapy. 40(11). 4741–4757. 6 indexed citations
6.
Baghdadi, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). #Coronavirus on TikTok: user engagement with misinformation as a potential threat to public health behavior. JAMIA Open. 6(1). ooad013–ooad013. 20 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Matthew L., Brent N. Reed, & Rena D. Malik. (2022). Association of lower urinary tract symptoms and diuretic adherence. LUTS Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 14(5). 366–372. 1 indexed citations
8.
MacDonald, Susan M. & Rena D. Malik. (2022). Women in Academic Urology: A Qualitative Analysis of the Relationship Between Pregnancy, Parenting, and Delayed Promotion. Urology. 168. 13–20. 10 indexed citations
9.
Malik, Rena D., et al.. (2022). An Assessment of Residency Wellness Programming in Urology Training Programs. Urology. 165. 113–119. 4 indexed citations
10.
Malik, Rena D., et al.. (2021). Patient Frustration with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Education Met with Resilient Response. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 41(1). 409–415. 6 indexed citations
11.
Walter, Dawn, et al.. (2021). An Evaluation of the Readability and Content-Quality of Pelvic Organ Prolapse YouTube Transcripts. Urology. 154. 120–126. 9 indexed citations
12.
Scarpato, Kristen R., et al.. (2020). Virtual grand rounds as a novel means for applicants and programs to connect in the era of COVID-19. The American Journal of Surgery. 221(5). 956–961. 13 indexed citations
13.
Caturegli, Giorgio, Nicole Hays, Christopher Laird, et al.. (2020). Trends in female surgeon authorship – The role of the middle author. The American Journal of Surgery. 220(6). 1541–1548. 9 indexed citations
14.
Malik, Rena D., et al.. (2019). Prospective Evaluation of Urodynamic Utility in a Subspecialty Tertiary Practice. Urology. 126. 59–64. 3 indexed citations
15.
Malik, Rena D., Alana Christie, & Philippe E. Zimmern. (2019). Posterior Compartment Prolapse Occurrence After Anterior Vaginal Wall Suspension. Urology. 133. 84–90. 3 indexed citations
16.
Malik, Rena D., et al.. (2014). Comparison of patients undergoing laser vaporization of the prostate versus TURP using the ACS-NSQIP database. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 18(1). 18–24. 12 indexed citations
17.
Large, Michael C., Rena D. Malik, Joshua A. Cohn, et al.. (2014). Prospective Health-related Quality of Life Analysis for Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion. Urology. 84(4). 808–814. 19 indexed citations
18.
Malik, Rena D., Judith D. Goldberg, Tsivia Hochman, & Herbert Lepor. (2011). Three-Year Postoperative Ultrasensitive Prostate-Specific Antigen Following Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Is a Predictor for Delayed Biochemical Recurrence. European Urology. 60(3). 548–553. 17 indexed citations
19.
Malik, Rena D., et al.. (1986). Evaluation of histological appearance of tissues removed by cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA). Acta Neurochirurgica. 81(3-4). 132–134. 24 indexed citations
20.
Malik, Rena D., et al.. (1985). Mycopathology of cerebral mycosis. Acta Neurochirurgica. 78(3-4). 161–163. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026