Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change
20061.7k citationsMarko P. Hekkert, Roald A.A. Suurs et al.Technological Forecasting and Social Changeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by R.E.H.M. Smits
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R.E.H.M. Smits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.E.H.M. Smits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.E.H.M. Smits more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.E.H.M. Smits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.E.H.M. Smits. The network helps show where R.E.H.M. Smits may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R.E.H.M. Smits
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R.E.H.M. Smits.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R.E.H.M. Smits based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R.E.H.M. Smits. R.E.H.M. Smits is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hekkert, Marko P., Roald A.A. Suurs, Simona O. Negro, Stefan Kuhlmann, & R.E.H.M. Smits. (2006). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 74(4). 413–432.1720 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Leeuwis, Cees, et al.. (2006). Equivocations on the post privatization dynamics in agricultural innovation systems. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 3–5.8 indexed citations
5.
Grin, John, Cees Leeuwis, Laurens Klerkx, R.E.H.M. Smits, & A. Kuipers. (2005). Equivocations on the post privatisation dynamics in agricultural innovation systems. Position paper scientific program Transforum.. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).4 indexed citations
6.
Smits, R.E.H.M., et al.. (2005). Perceived uncertainties regarding socio-technological transformation: towards a typology. 1–24.2 indexed citations
7.
Kuhlmann, Stefan, et al.. (2004). Innovation through Collaboration.1 indexed citations
Smits, R.E.H.M., et al.. (1998). GDSS-supported technology scans at the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. Journal of Decision System. 7. 309–329.2 indexed citations
10.
Smits, R.E.H.M., et al.. (1996). The role of technology assessment in contemporary technology policy. International Journal of Technology Management. 11. 688–702.1 indexed citations
11.
Hertog, Pim den & R.E.H.M. Smits. (1996). User involvement in RTD. Concepts, practices and policy lessons.5 indexed citations
12.
Smits, R.E.H.M.. (1994). Elk land krijgt de technologie die het verdient. Maar lang niet altijd die technologie welke het nodig heeft. Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.