Red Crescent Societies

19 total papers · 482 total citations
14 papers, 331 citations indexed

About

Red Crescent Societies is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology and Management of Technology and Innovation. According to data from OpenAlex, Red Crescent Societies has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 331 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation. Recurrent topics in Red Crescent Societies's work include Blood donation and transfusion practices (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper). Red Crescent Societies is often cited by papers focused on Blood donation and transfusion practices (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper). Red Crescent Societies collaborates with scholars based in . Red Crescent Societies's co-authors include WFP WFP, Karen MacClune, Michael Szönyi and Kasthuri Venkateswaran and has published in prestigious journals such as World Health Organization eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

Red Crescent Societies

12 papers receiving 289 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Red Crescent Societies 110 108 67 53 42 14 331
Stephen Cropper 66 0.6× 16 0.1× 23 0.3× 24 0.5× 19 294
Kathryn McLachlan 149 1.4× 16 0.1× 6 0.1× 48 0.9× 14 315
Ranit Chatterjee 104 0.9× 8 0.1× 8 0.1× 70 1.3× 15 286
Emmanuel Osuteye 116 1.1× 9 0.1× 18 0.3× 101 1.9× 16 275
Lou Gallagher 36 0.3× 37 0.3× 38 0.6× 2 0.0× 5 0.1× 18 335
Theodoros Karapiperis 46 0.4× 20 0.2× 35 0.5× 17 0.3× 13 342
Thomas Roca 117 1.1× 8 0.1× 17 0.3× 33 0.6× 11 365
Sigamani Panneer 38 0.3× 5 0.0× 17 0.3× 31 0.6× 30 291
Alyson Wright 58 0.5× 10 0.1× 20 0.3× 19 0.4× 24 301
Friedrich Gabel 205 1.9× 3 0.0× 14 0.2× 63 1.2× 12 319

Countries citing papers authored by Red Crescent Societies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Red Crescent Societies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Red Crescent Societies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Red Crescent Societies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Red Crescent Societies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Red Crescent Societies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Red Crescent Societies. The network helps show where Red Crescent Societies may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Red Crescent Societies

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Red Crescent Societies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Red Crescent Societies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Red Crescent Societies. Red Crescent Societies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026