Rebekah E. Gee

1.3k citations
57 papers · 900 indexed · h-index 17

Rebekah E. Gee

56 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

Rebekah E. Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 348
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 391
  • Health 147
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 450
  • General Health Professions 212
Replace Pooja Mehta with:
Pooja Mehta United States
Holly B. Shulman United States
Laurie Zephyrin United States
Brittany D. Chambers United States
Heike Thiel de Bocanegra United States
Laura Schummers Canada
Simone Grilo Diniz Brazil
Mary Moore United States
Nicholas Rubashkin United States
Sarah Verbiest United States
Rebekah E. Gee relative to Pooja Mehta United States Pooja Mehta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Pooja Mehta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebekah E. Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebekah E. Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebekah E. Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebekah E. Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebekah E. Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebekah E. Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebekah E. Gee. The network helps show where Rebekah E. Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rebekah E. Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rebekah E. Gee Line = papers co-authored together Rebekah E. Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202027
2 20193
3 201911
4 201843
5 20163
6 201538
7 201597
8 20145
9 201414
10 201310
11 20138
12 201345
13 20132
14 20135
15 201214
16 201217
17 201211
18 201249
19 2009117
20 20079

About Rebekah E. Gee

Rebekah E. Gee is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 900 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (19 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (17 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (17 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (348 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (391 citations), Health (147 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (450 citations) and General Health Professions (212 citations). Rebekah E. Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Judette Louis, Judith A. Long, M. Kathryn Menard, Maureen P. Corry, Nandita Mitra, Fei Wan, Stephen Phillippi, Katherine P. Theall, Xu Xiong and Gabriella Pridjian. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Public Health, JAMA and The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026